2016
DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.3208
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isolated thrombosis of right spermatic vein with underlying Factor V Leiden mutation

Abstract: Spermatic vein thrombosis is a very uncommon clinical entity. Most cases involve the left side. Herein, we present an unusual case of a young man who presented with spermatic vein thrombosis on the right side with an underlying Factor V Leiden mutation. To our knowledge, it is the first case in the literature.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
5
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(14 reference statements)
1
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Summation of all the reports make us come to a conclusion that medical therapy may be successful if only a single superficial spermatic vein is involved, while in cases like ours where the majority of pampiniform plexus is thrombosed, surgical management will have a better outcome. This conclusion is similar to the one by Bolat et al who opined that treatment can be started conservatively, with surgical intervention reserved for failed cases on an emergent basis [ 5 ]. Similarly Isenberg et al advice that though venography, Doppler can be diagnostic, surgery should not be delayed in doubtful cases [ 9 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Summation of all the reports make us come to a conclusion that medical therapy may be successful if only a single superficial spermatic vein is involved, while in cases like ours where the majority of pampiniform plexus is thrombosed, surgical management will have a better outcome. This conclusion is similar to the one by Bolat et al who opined that treatment can be started conservatively, with surgical intervention reserved for failed cases on an emergent basis [ 5 ]. Similarly Isenberg et al advice that though venography, Doppler can be diagnostic, surgery should not be delayed in doubtful cases [ 9 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Varicocele thromboses can occur post operatively (5 cases) or spontaneously (5 cases) [ 2 – 4 ]. Spontaneous thrombosis can occur due to trauma or in patients with coagulation abnormalities [ 5 ]. Kayes et al had reported that vigorous sexual or sporting activity, infections, trauma, long hour flights and drugs could cause this condition [ 6 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present case is relevant because it is the third of its kind reported on the right side worldwide (1,9) and because a favorable outcome and an acceptable follow-up were achieved. The limitations of this report include the fact that no specific etiology was found to explain the onset of the disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Bilateral pampiniform plexus thrombosis reported by Kamel et al was caused by protein C deficiency, whereas Bakshi described an idiopathic case mimicking incarcerated hernia [1,2]. The literature has described several etiologies for spermatic vein thrombosis, which include protein C deficiency, factor V Leiden mutation, underlying cancer, cardiac catheterization complications, inguinal region injury, and after suspected coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]. The nutcracker syndrome where there is compression of the left renal vein in the aortomesenteric space is also complicated by spermatic vein thrombosis in one study [8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The low blood flow in the left testicular vein as it joins the left renal vein is the cause of left dominance of spermatic vein thrombosis, and any cause of decreased flow in the testicular vein such as genitourinary malignancy or conditions like nutcracker syndrome might lead to spermatic cord thrombosis [ 4 ]. Isolated right spermatic vein thrombosis reported in one study was associated with underlying factor V Leiden mutation [ 3 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%