2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-0960.2009.00610.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isolated symptomatic cutaneous disease in hypereosinophilic syndrome

Abstract: A 41-year-old Phillipino man presented with a 3-year history of a relapsing and remitting generalized chronic pruritic erythematous papular and plaque-like eruption. Investigations showed a persistently elevated eosinophil count. His disease was limited to cutaneous involvement with an absence of demonstrable internal organ involvement, despite extensive investigations and multidisciplinary review. Other causes of eosinophilia were excluded. A diagnosis of idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome was made. Our pa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(31 reference statements)
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As in previously reports, 21–25 skin was the sole organ affected in HES in a minor proportion of our 150 patients with HES (6.7%). To our knowledge, this is the first study attempting to describe the spectrum of internal organ system involvement in patients with cHES.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…As in previously reports, 21–25 skin was the sole organ affected in HES in a minor proportion of our 150 patients with HES (6.7%). To our knowledge, this is the first study attempting to describe the spectrum of internal organ system involvement in patients with cHES.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…After removing duplicate and redundant articles, 25 papers were included in the present study for the final review and analysis. A thorough reading of these articles yielded a total of 32 cases of idiopathic HES with cutaneous involvement 5–29. A comprehensive review of these case reports indicated a slight male predominance (male, n = 19; female, n = 13).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%