2021
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.15552
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isolated Salter-Harris Type II Fracture of the Distal Ulna

Abstract: Isolated distal ulna epiphyseal plate injuries are very rare and are often associated with early epiphyseal plate arrest. A 13-year-old boy sustained an isolated minimally displaced Salter-Harris type II fracture of the left distal ulna following a fall from a bicycle. The fracture was reduced, and a long arm plaster cast was applied for four weeks. At the six-month follow-up, the patient presented with a painless, full range of movement of the left wrist, but on radiological examination, a mild shortening of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the reviewed literature and associated case reports, falling onto an outstretched hand is the most commonly reported injury mechanism. More specifically, compression across a pronated forearm in an ulnarly deviated and dorsiflexed wrist has been described [5]. While our patient did not recall the exact wrist position, the mid-radial scaphoid edema noted on the MRI may suggest an axial loading injury on a slightly ulnarly deviated wrist at the time of injury (Figure 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…In the reviewed literature and associated case reports, falling onto an outstretched hand is the most commonly reported injury mechanism. More specifically, compression across a pronated forearm in an ulnarly deviated and dorsiflexed wrist has been described [5]. While our patient did not recall the exact wrist position, the mid-radial scaphoid edema noted on the MRI may suggest an axial loading injury on a slightly ulnarly deviated wrist at the time of injury (Figure 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%