2003
DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200301000-00007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isolated Revision of the Patellar Component in Total Knee Arthroplasty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
26
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Problems affecting the patellofemoral joint have been identified as the most common cause of failure in primary TKA [11], and appropriate management of the patella during revision TKA has similarly been shown to strongly influence the clinical outcome [12,13]. Complications can include soft tissue impingement, avascular necrosis, patellofemoral instability, extensor mechanism ruptures, and patellar fracture [12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Problems affecting the patellofemoral joint have been identified as the most common cause of failure in primary TKA [11], and appropriate management of the patella during revision TKA has similarly been shown to strongly influence the clinical outcome [12,13]. Complications can include soft tissue impingement, avascular necrosis, patellofemoral instability, extensor mechanism ruptures, and patellar fracture [12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This high rate of failure has subsequently led to the markedly decreased use of these components [12,16,31,36]. The need for revision after failure of the metal-backed patella has led some authors to attempt an isolated revision of the patellar component with variable success [2,8,9,11,20,21,24]. We asked whether the clinical outcome of isolated patellar component revisions for metal-backed patellar failure performed at our institution was comparable to recently published reports in the literature with regard to the subsequent failure rate, the Knee Society knee score and function score, the Knee Society roentgenographic evaluation, and continued knee symptoms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reported success, defined as not requiring a second revision procedure, after an isolated patellar component revision for metal-backed patellar failure is variable with a range of 78% to 100% [2,8,9,11,20,21,24]. Previous authors have cautioned that an isolated patellar revision can lead to an unsatisfactory result requiring a second revision procedure [2,8,9,24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most of these studies involve patients with different implant designs and other presenting symptoms. Furthermore, long-term results that predict the outcome after isolated secondary resurfacing of the patellar component are lacking [4,16]. Therefore, the indication for patellar resurfacing in TKA needs to be defined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%