Abstract:BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Bony internal auditory canal diverticula are relatively common, occurring in approximately 5% of temporal bone CTs. Internal auditory canal diverticula have historically been considered incidental; however, a recent publication reported that internal auditory canal diverticula are associated with sensorineural hearing loss. The objective of this study was to further characterize this potential association in a large cohort of patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 1759 patients und… Show more
“…There remains lack of clarity over the implication of IAC diverticula in patients with and without OS. Our finding of a 5.5% prevalence for isolated IAC diverticula on CT is in keeping with previous studies [ 5 , 6 ]. We also demonstrated IAC diverticula to be present in 23% of patients with additional CT features of OS, as compared with 10–39% incidence of cavitary OS at this site in previous studies [ 3 , 4 , 9 – 11 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Morphological imaging features were partly based on those investigated in previous reports [ 6 , 7 ] and for their potential ease of assessment in clinical reporting. The following morphological criteria were evaluated (Figs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Focal low attenuation diverticula have been demonstrated to arise from the antero-inferior margin of the internal auditory canal (IAC) fundus on CT [ 1 – 5 ]. Isolated IAC diverticula are seen in approximately 5% of temporal bone CT studies but their clinical significance remains uncertain [ 5 , 6 ]. Such IAC diverticula are also described in the context of cavitary otospongiosis (OS) [ 3 , 4 ] where diverticula associated with cavitary plaques are typically demonstrated in a similar location at the fundus of the IAC [ 4 ] (Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been observed that IAC diverticula have a variable appearance on CT with respect to their depth, degree of definition and shape. Mihal et al showed that the depth of the IAC diverticula differed between patients with and without OS [ 6 ] whilst Muelleman et al found no relationship between diverticulum size and hearing loss [ 7 ]; however, the full implications of the different morphological characteristics is yet to be explored. We therefore aimed to ascertain whether there were particular morphological features of IAC diverticula which were associated with the presence of additional CT features of fenestral or pericochlear OS, and whether the morphology of the IAC diverticula influenced patterns of hearing loss in patients with or without OS.…”
Purpose
The association of internal auditory canal (IAC) fundal diverticula with otospongiosis (OS) and their clinical significance remain unclear. We explored whether isolated IAC diverticula were morphologically different from those with additional CT features of OS, and whether IAC diverticula morphology influenced patterns of hearing loss.
Methods
Consecutive temporal bone CT studies with (n = 978) and without (n = 306) features of OS were retrospectively assessed. Two independent observers evaluated the presence of IAC diverticula morphological features (depth, neck:depth ratio, definition of contour and angulation of shape), and these were correlated with the presence of fenestral and pericochlear OS. Audiometric profiles were analysed for the isolated IAC diverticula and those with fenestral OS alone. Continuous data was compared using Wilcoxon rank sum tests and categorical data with chi-squared and Fisher’s exact tests.
Results
Ninety-five isolated IAC diverticula were demonstrated in 54/978 patients (5.5%) without CT evidence of OS (31M, 23F, mean age 46), and 119 IAC diverticula were demonstrated in 71/306 patients (23%) with CT evidence of OS (23M, 48F, mean age 55). Reduced neck:depth ratio, ill definition and angulation were all significantly associated with the presence of pericochlear OS (p < 0.001), whilst only ill definition was associated with the presence of fenestral OS alone (p < 0.05). No morphological feature was associated with conductive hearing loss in isolated diverticula or with sensorineural hearing loss in diverticula with fenestral OS alone.
Conclusion
IAC diverticula associated with pericochlear OS demonstrate different morphological features from isolated IAC diverticula. There are no clear audiometric implications of these morphological features.
“…There remains lack of clarity over the implication of IAC diverticula in patients with and without OS. Our finding of a 5.5% prevalence for isolated IAC diverticula on CT is in keeping with previous studies [ 5 , 6 ]. We also demonstrated IAC diverticula to be present in 23% of patients with additional CT features of OS, as compared with 10–39% incidence of cavitary OS at this site in previous studies [ 3 , 4 , 9 – 11 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Morphological imaging features were partly based on those investigated in previous reports [ 6 , 7 ] and for their potential ease of assessment in clinical reporting. The following morphological criteria were evaluated (Figs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Focal low attenuation diverticula have been demonstrated to arise from the antero-inferior margin of the internal auditory canal (IAC) fundus on CT [ 1 – 5 ]. Isolated IAC diverticula are seen in approximately 5% of temporal bone CT studies but their clinical significance remains uncertain [ 5 , 6 ]. Such IAC diverticula are also described in the context of cavitary otospongiosis (OS) [ 3 , 4 ] where diverticula associated with cavitary plaques are typically demonstrated in a similar location at the fundus of the IAC [ 4 ] (Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been observed that IAC diverticula have a variable appearance on CT with respect to their depth, degree of definition and shape. Mihal et al showed that the depth of the IAC diverticula differed between patients with and without OS [ 6 ] whilst Muelleman et al found no relationship between diverticulum size and hearing loss [ 7 ]; however, the full implications of the different morphological characteristics is yet to be explored. We therefore aimed to ascertain whether there were particular morphological features of IAC diverticula which were associated with the presence of additional CT features of fenestral or pericochlear OS, and whether the morphology of the IAC diverticula influenced patterns of hearing loss in patients with or without OS.…”
Purpose
The association of internal auditory canal (IAC) fundal diverticula with otospongiosis (OS) and their clinical significance remain unclear. We explored whether isolated IAC diverticula were morphologically different from those with additional CT features of OS, and whether IAC diverticula morphology influenced patterns of hearing loss.
Methods
Consecutive temporal bone CT studies with (n = 978) and without (n = 306) features of OS were retrospectively assessed. Two independent observers evaluated the presence of IAC diverticula morphological features (depth, neck:depth ratio, definition of contour and angulation of shape), and these were correlated with the presence of fenestral and pericochlear OS. Audiometric profiles were analysed for the isolated IAC diverticula and those with fenestral OS alone. Continuous data was compared using Wilcoxon rank sum tests and categorical data with chi-squared and Fisher’s exact tests.
Results
Ninety-five isolated IAC diverticula were demonstrated in 54/978 patients (5.5%) without CT evidence of OS (31M, 23F, mean age 46), and 119 IAC diverticula were demonstrated in 71/306 patients (23%) with CT evidence of OS (23M, 48F, mean age 55). Reduced neck:depth ratio, ill definition and angulation were all significantly associated with the presence of pericochlear OS (p < 0.001), whilst only ill definition was associated with the presence of fenestral OS alone (p < 0.05). No morphological feature was associated with conductive hearing loss in isolated diverticula or with sensorineural hearing loss in diverticula with fenestral OS alone.
Conclusion
IAC diverticula associated with pericochlear OS demonstrate different morphological features from isolated IAC diverticula. There are no clear audiometric implications of these morphological features.
“…This study also compared unilateral diverticula to their contralateral control side to show that IAC diverticula are not associated with a worse pure tone average or worse recognition score. 16 Given the preponderance of IAC diverticula independent of otosclerosis, we suspect that IAC diverticula may be congenital. Bast and Anson described endochondral otic capsule development in detail.…”
Hypothesis: We hypothesize that internal auditory canal (IAC) diverticula occur independent of otosclerosis as demonstrated by temporal bone histopathology. Background: Diverticula at the anterior-inferior aspect of the internal auditory canal have been described histologically in the setting of cavitary otosclerosis. Recent radiographic studies show the prevalence of IAC diverticula that is higher than what can be accounted for by cavitary otosclerosis alone. Methods: We examined hematoxylin and eosin temporal bone histopathology slides with otosclerosis involving the internal auditory canal. We also examined bones from normal hearing subjects with normal histologic findings. Temporal bones were included if donors were >18 years of age at time of death and adequate horizontal cuts were available to evaluate the area of interest. Results: IAC diverticula were found in 33 of 47 (70%) temporal bones with IAC otosclerosis and in 5 of 20 (25%) normal temporal bones. The difference in mean pure tone averages (PTA) in the normal temporal bones with (PTA 7.3 +/− 7) and without (PTA 8 +/− 2) diverticula was not statistically significant (p = 0.86) Conclusion: Internal auditory canal diverticula which have been previously demonstrated to occur in the setting of cavitary otosclerosis can also occur independent from otosclerosis. Subjects with diverticula but without other temporal bone pathology have normal hearing thresholds.
Objectives/Hypothesis
Internal auditory diverticula in adults have been found to exist independent of otosclerosis, and in the presence of otosclerosis. We sought to determine the prevalence of internal auditory canal (IAC) diverticula in a pediatric cohort, to assess whether IAC diverticula are a risk factor for hearing loss, and the co‐occurrence of otic capsule hypoattenuation.
Study Design
Retrospective review.
Methods
A single‐site retrospective review of high‐resolution temporal bones computed tomography (CT) scans including the presence and size of diverticula and hypoattenuation of the otic capsule. Demographic, imaging, and audiometric data were collected and descriptively analyzed. Bivariate analysis of collected variables was conducted. Comparisons between sides in unilateral cases were also performed.
Results
16/600 (2.7%; 95% CI [2.0%, 3.4%]) were found to have IAC diverticula. Six were bilateral. Thirty‐one patients (5.2%) were found to have hypoattenuation of the otic capsule. There were no coincident cases of IAC diverticulum and hypoattenuation of the otic capsule. There was no association between the presence of IAC diverticula and age (P = .13). In six patients with unilateral diverticula, pure tone average (P = .42), and word recognition (P = .27) scores were not significantly different when compared to the normal, contralateral side.
Conclusions
The prevalence of IAC diverticula in children is lower than the prevalence in adults. IAC diverticula in children likely represent congenital variants of temporal bone anatomy. Similar to adult populations, there is evidence that IAC diverticula in children are likely not an independent risk factor for hearing loss.
Level of Evidence
4 Laryngoscope, 131:E1683–E1687, 2021
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.