2019
DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/aqy175
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isolated Flat Epithelial Atypia on Core Biopsy Specimens Is Associated With a Low Risk of Upgrade at Excision

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lamb et al 10 accrued 208 CNBs with pure FEA over a nine-year period and observed an upgrade rate to carcinoma of 2.4% but they reported finding a higher risk lesion in 29.8% of cases (ADH 18.3%, LCIS 4.8%, ALH 6.7%). While Hugar et al 11 identified only one upgrade to carcinoma out of 111 CNBs with FEA they observed a higher risk lesion in 36% of cases (ADH 18%, ALH/LCIS 18%). Both studies concluded that the rate of upgrade to carcinoma is low, but surveillance is warranted along with consideration of chemoprevention for risk reduction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Lamb et al 10 accrued 208 CNBs with pure FEA over a nine-year period and observed an upgrade rate to carcinoma of 2.4% but they reported finding a higher risk lesion in 29.8% of cases (ADH 18.3%, LCIS 4.8%, ALH 6.7%). While Hugar et al 11 identified only one upgrade to carcinoma out of 111 CNBs with FEA they observed a higher risk lesion in 36% of cases (ADH 18%, ALH/LCIS 18%). Both studies concluded that the rate of upgrade to carcinoma is low, but surveillance is warranted along with consideration of chemoprevention for risk reduction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Most series analyzing the upgrade rate at excision of FEA are relatively small, with only a few studies having over 100 cases. 2,[9][10][11] Furthermore, some published series 9 did not specify whether radiologic-pathologic concordance of the CNB cases was assessed or did not include dedicated re-review of histologic findings. 2,10 A recent systematic review of "16 higher-quality studies" found an estimated risk of upgrade to carcinoma of 7.5% and an estimated risk of upgrade to ADH of 18.6%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reported incidence of pure FEA diagnosed on CNB varies from <1–22% [ 9 , 98 ]. Similarly, the reported rate of upgrade to malignancy ranges from 0% to 38% [ 8 , 9 , 10 , 32 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 46 , 49 , 51 , 67 , 98 , 99 , 100 , 101 , 102 , 103 , 104 , 105 , 106 , 107 , 108 , 109 , 110 , 111 , 112 , 113 , 114 , 115 , 116 , 117 , 118 , 119 , 120 , 121 , 122 , 123 , 124 , 125 , 126 , 127 ]. Some studies have suggested criteria for excision, including assessment of radiologic features (i.e., mass versus calcifications) [ 50 ], span of calcifications [ 38 ] residual calcifications post CNB [ 103 , 111 , 117 ], and considerat...…”
Section: Clinical Significancementioning
confidence: 99%