2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.12.054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isolated dorsal dislocations of the talonavicular and calcaneocuboid articulations (Chopart joints) from a low-energy mechanism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…4 Las lesiones de la articulación de Chopart por lo general son causadas por traumatismos de alta energía; ocurren con mayor frecuencia como resultado de un aplastamiento directo en el dorso del pie durante un accidente automovilístico o caídas de gran altura. 4,5 Las fuerzas dirigidas plantarmente del mediopié predisponen a dislocar el mediopié en dirección plantar en relación con el retropié y se asocia con un mayor traumatismo de tejidos blandos. [6][7][8] Bosman y cols, 9 reportaron que 80% de estas lesiones fueron luxaciones mediales y 17% laterales.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…4 Las lesiones de la articulación de Chopart por lo general son causadas por traumatismos de alta energía; ocurren con mayor frecuencia como resultado de un aplastamiento directo en el dorso del pie durante un accidente automovilístico o caídas de gran altura. 4,5 Las fuerzas dirigidas plantarmente del mediopié predisponen a dislocar el mediopié en dirección plantar en relación con el retropié y se asocia con un mayor traumatismo de tejidos blandos. [6][7][8] Bosman y cols, 9 reportaron que 80% de estas lesiones fueron luxaciones mediales y 17% laterales.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…37 Fracture-dislocations among low-energy traumas are rare but have been reported in misstep injuries. 38…”
Section: Differential Diagnosis High-energy Midtarsal Injuriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reduction of Chopart joint ROM by approx. 50% Schildhauer et al [ 49 ] 27 M Fall from 5 m −ve Complete lateral Chopart dislocation + navicular and cuboid fracture from crush XR Day 7—Internal fixation (bridge plate for navicular and plate for cuboid) following closed reduction and Ex-fix for soft tissue recovery 12w of toe-touch WB 6w K-wires removed and medial column bridge plate was shortened to allow for restoration of TNJ motion One year: all hardware was removed because of soft tissue irritation at the dorsum of his foot when wearing shoes Harris et al [ 50 ] 25 M Missed step descending stairs −ve Dorsal Chopart dislocation + navicular fracture XR + CT Closed reduction failed ORIF Non-WB (no timeframe specified) Lost to follow up Fares et al [ 51 ] 20 M Forklift Crush injury (MVA) PES + ve CCJ + NCJ dislocation + cuboid impaction fracture and avulsion fracture of anterior calcaneal process XR + CT Closed reduction failed ORIF (CCJ K-wires, NC Plate) 8w of BK cast, K wires removed at 12w 1 year: patient complains of stiffness and intermittent pain on walking removal of hardware is planned Alhadhoud et al [ 52 ] 25 M Forklift crush injury (MVA) −ve Open fracture dislocation of CCJ + NCJ + AP calcaneal fracture XR + CT Internal fixation 5 weeks following closed reduction due to infection NC1/2 plate, CCJ K-wire 5w non-WBBK cast during infection Non-WB no cast for 6 weeks after ORIF followed by progressive WB 14 weeks: VAS 0/10, AOFAS 83, EQ5D 90, no complications Puente et al [ ...…”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 99%