2021
DOI: 10.1177/0300891621997920
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isolated cerebellar progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation: focus on imaging

Abstract: Introduction: Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) is caused by JC virus opportunistic infection in the setting of immunodeficiency. Typical imaging features are multifocal and asymmetric lesions within supratentorial subcortical white matter in parieto-occipital regions. Case description: A 47-year-old patient experienced a relapse of acute myeloid leukemia 21 months after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. He also had visual impairment and magnetic resonance imaging showed an isolated cereb… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Noteworthy in our case is that damage was limited to the pontocerebellar area, sparing the typical localization of PML lesions in subcortical areas (more than 90% of cases), mostly in frontoparietal white matter [16]. When PML involves posterior fossa structures, usually subcortical affectation is also present [17], so that isolated infratentorial localization is very infrequent [18]. However, the MR image in our case fits to those reported by other authors [19].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Noteworthy in our case is that damage was limited to the pontocerebellar area, sparing the typical localization of PML lesions in subcortical areas (more than 90% of cases), mostly in frontoparietal white matter [16]. When PML involves posterior fossa structures, usually subcortical affectation is also present [17], so that isolated infratentorial localization is very infrequent [18]. However, the MR image in our case fits to those reported by other authors [19].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%