Isokinetic Strength, Endurance, and Subjective Outcomes After Biceps Tenotomy Versus Tenodesis

Wittstein, Jocelyn; Queen, Robin M.; Abbey, Alicia N.; Toth, Alison P.; Moorman, Claude T.

doi:10.1177/0363546510387512

Cited by 106 publications

(96 citation statements)

References 39 publications

(49 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…One study by Queen et al, looked at the effect of jumping with different foot types. For subjects with flat feet, landing from a jump resulted in higher contact area and maximum forces in the medial midfoot when compared to subjects with normal foot types [22]. However, the current study only minor differences in plantar loading beneath the lateral column Fig.…”

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 58%

Plantar loading during jumping while wearing a rigid carbon graphite footplate

et al. 2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and education use, including for instruction at the authors institution and sharing with colleagues.Other uses, including reproduction and distribution, or selling or licensing copies, or posting to personal, institutional or third party websites are prohibited.

show abstract

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 58%

Plantar loading during jumping while wearing a rigid carbon graphite footplate

et al. 2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…"Popeye" deformity) (Chillag and Chillag, 2014;Lim et al, 2011). Biceps tenodesis is an alternative to tenotomy that restores strength, stability, and normal appearance of the upper extremity (Hsu et al, 2011;Wittstein et al, 2011).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Regional mechanical properties of the long head of the biceps tendon

Kolz

Suter

Henninger

2015

Clinical Biomechanics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…[7–9] Overall, excellent clinical outcomes have been reported with both tenodesis and tenotomy, although a small percentage of patients have persistent or recurrent bicipital problems. [4810–18] The literature remains sparse on the surgical outcomes of revision procedures for this difficult patient population. The purpose of this article is to report on clinical outcomes after revision biceps tenodesis.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Clinical outcomes of revision biceps tenodesis

Gregory

Harwood

Gochanour

et al. 2012

Int J Shoulder Surg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose:Biceps tenotomy and tenodesis are effective treatment options for biceps pathology, but outcomes of revision surgery are not known. This study examines the clinical outcomes of patients who have undergone a revision biceps tenodesis.Materials and Methods:A retrospective review of all patients since 2004 (N = 21) who had undergone a revision biceps tenodesis with greater than 6-month follow-up was completed. A follow-up survey was carried out, and the visual analog scale (VAS), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), Simple Shoulder Test (SST), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), and University of California – Los Angeles (UCLA) scores were obtained, along with SF-12 Mental (MCS-12) and Physical Component Summaries (PCS-12).Results:Indications for revision surgery were continued pain (14) and ruptured biceps (7). Complete follow-up examinations were performed in 15 of 21 patients (71.4%). Average follow-up was 33.4 ± 23.5 months. The mean postoperative scores were 1.9 out of 10, VAS; 79 out of 100, SANE; 10.2 out of 12, SST; 83 out of 100, ASES; 29 out of 35, UCLA; 44, PCS- 12; and 47.1, MCS- 12. Five patients were considered failures with a UCLA score below 27. Seventeen of twenty-one patient underwent concomitant procedures. Complete preoperative and postoperative data were collected for 14 patients. All scores demonstrated highly significant improvement from preoperative levels (P < 0.005), except for the MCS-12. There was no statistically significant difference in the outcomes of revision due to rupture and revision due to persistent pain.Conclusions:The results suggest that revision subpectoral biceps tenodesis provides significant pain relief and improvement in functional outcomes at a mean follow-up of 33.4 months.Level of Evidence:Case Series, Level 4.

show abstract

Isokinetic Strength, Endurance, and Subjective Outcomes After Biceps Tenotomy Versus Tenodesis

Abstract: Subjective outcomes are similar for patients treated with tenotomy and tenodesis. Tenotomy decreases supination peak torque relative to the nonoperative side and tenodesis.

Cited by 106 publications

References 39 publications

Plantar loading during jumping while wearing a rigid carbon graphite footplate

Plantar loading during jumping while wearing a rigid carbon graphite footplate

Regional mechanical properties of the long head of the biceps tendon

Clinical outcomes of revision biceps tenodesis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About