1998
DOI: 10.1097/00005768-199805001-01187
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isokinetic Leg Strength of Paralympic Athletes With Cerebral Palsy: A Comparative Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the contrary, our data indicate that athletes who showed more severe impairments (T35 and T36) also present more asymmetric PT (>10%) and a lower running performance. Our values are similar to those reported by Andrade et al (2005) , 23%±13% between knee extensors and 24%±12% for flexors in soccer players with CP. It is interesting to mention that the authors evaluated only the 60°/sec velocity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…On the contrary, our data indicate that athletes who showed more severe impairments (T35 and T36) also present more asymmetric PT (>10%) and a lower running performance. Our values are similar to those reported by Andrade et al (2005) , 23%±13% between knee extensors and 24%±12% for flexors in soccer players with CP. It is interesting to mention that the authors evaluated only the 60°/sec velocity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…We did not find studies in the literature that had evaluated the muscle ratios at different speeds in sprinters with CP. Andrade et al (2005) , evaluated the PT of concentric contractions at 60°/sec of soccer players with spastic hemiparesis and reported that 42% of the participants had the conventional ratio, at least of the one limb, out of normal range. Interestingly, the limb most affected by imbalances was the nonaffected by CP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The majority of studies assessed strength using isometric (16/30: 53%) 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 or isokinetic testing protocols (10/30: 33%). 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 Two studies combined isometric and isokinetic testing. 49 , 50 A further two studies used the one-repetition maximum 51 , 52 and one used manual muscle testing (See Table 3 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 30 , 43 , 44 Some studies (both isometric and isokinetic) calculated muscle group ratios, including concentric external and internal rotator strength ratios. 39 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 47 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%