2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.camwa.2020.11.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isogeometric residual minimization (iGRM) for non-stationary Stokes and Navier–Stokes problems

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lemma 8. Let u θ * be a quasi-minimizer and δ * > 0 be the smallest constant satisfying (38). It holds…”
Section: Error Estimates In the Quasi-minimizer Sensementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Lemma 8. Let u θ * be a quasi-minimizer and δ * > 0 be the smallest constant satisfying (38). It holds…”
Section: Error Estimates In the Quasi-minimizer Sensementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proposition 9 (Local a priori error estimate II). Let u θ * be a quasi-minimizer and δ * > 0 be the smallest constant satisfying (38). If Assumption 2 is satisfied, it holds:…”
Section: Error Estimates In the Quasi-minimizer Sensementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mixing the advantages of the residual minimization with the benefits resulting from isogeometric analysis, implicit dynamics, and an alternating direction solver, a novel computational implicit method called Isogeometric Residual Minimization (iGRM) with direction splitting was recently introduced. Following this framework, an application of variational residual minimization to the stationary and timedependent Stokes equations is presented in [14]. B-splines are used to discretize both trial and test spaces, and the scheme is refactored in such a way as to expose Kronecker products.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%