2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2016.05.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isogeometric configuration design sensitivity analysis of finite deformation curved beam structures using Jaumann strain formulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Wang et al [Wang and Turteltaub (2015)], the shape sensitivity analysis considering discontinuities in the objective functions is derived using continuum adjoint method. In Choi et al [Choi, Yoon and Cho (2016)], the continuum adjoint method is derived for finite deformations of curved beams. It is also notable that with the development of isogeometric analysis, shape optimization has been applied to structures with increasingly complicated geometries, e.g.…”
Section: Some Remarks and Discussion In Isogeometric Shape Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Wang et al [Wang and Turteltaub (2015)], the shape sensitivity analysis considering discontinuities in the objective functions is derived using continuum adjoint method. In Choi et al [Choi, Yoon and Cho (2016)], the continuum adjoint method is derived for finite deformations of curved beams. It is also notable that with the development of isogeometric analysis, shape optimization has been applied to structures with increasingly complicated geometries, e.g.…”
Section: Some Remarks and Discussion In Isogeometric Shape Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context of isogeometric shape optimization, the exact geometric representation enables the computation of the boundary geometric parameters easily and seamlessly, hence, providing a natural platform to implement the continuum adjoint method. This has been intensively studied by Seonho Cho and his co-authors in Cho et al [Cho and Ha (2009)] for general discussions, in Ha et al [Ha, Choi and Cho (2010)] using T-spline based isogeometric method, in Ahn et al [Ahn and Cho (2010)] for level-set-based topology optimization of heat conduction problems, in Koo et al [Koo, Yoon and Cho (2013)] coping with Kronecker delta property, in Yoon et al [Yoon, Ha and Cho (2013); Yoon, Choi and Cho (2015)] for shape design optimization of heat conduction problems, in Choi et al [Choi and Cho (2014)] for stress intensity factors of curved crack problems, in Lee et al [Lee and Cho (2015)] for optimizing built-up structures, in Lee et al [Lee, Lee and Cho (2016)] for ferromagnetic materials in magnetic actuators, in Yoon et al [Yoon and Cho (2016)] for boundary integral equations, in Choi et al [Choi, Yoon and Cho (2016)] for designing curved Kirchhoff beams with finite deformations, in Lee et al [Lee, Yoon and Cho (2017)] for topological shape optimization using dual evolution with boundary integral equation and level sets, in Choi et al [Choi and Cho (2018a)] for designing lattice structures embedded on curve surfaces, in Choi et al [Choi and Cho (2018b)] for using curved beams to design auxetic structures and in Ahn et al [Ahn, Choi and Cho (2018); Ahn, Koo, Kim et al (2018)] for designing nanoscale structures. Wang and his co-authors implemented the continuum adjoint method in Wang et al [Wang and Turteltaub (2015)] for quasi-static problems considering discontinuities in the objective functions, in Wang et al ; Wang and Kumar (2017)] for transient heat conduction problems and in Wang et al [Wang, Poh, Dirrenberger et al (2017)] to design auxetic structures using numerical homogenization method.…”
Section: Ddimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is noted that, hereafter, the argument is often omitted for brevity. The linearized translational and rotational strains are discretized aswhere W N,S defines the differentiation of NURBS basis function with respect to the arc-length coordinate, calculated by using a chain rule of differentiation 31 . From the governing equations of Eq.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…( 5). We define an arc-length parameter s ∈ Ω ≡ [0, L] that parameterizes the beam neutral axis with the initial (undeformed) length L in a way that [6] s(ϕ 0 (ξ)) =…”
Section: Linear Kinematics and Equilibrium Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%