2016
DOI: 10.1186/s13059-015-0862-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isoform prefiltering improves performance of count-based methods for analysis of differential transcript usage

Abstract: BackgroundRNA-seq has been a boon to the quantitative analysis of transcriptomes. A notable application is the detection of changes in transcript usage between experimental conditions. For example, discovery of pathological alternative splicing may allow the development of new treatments or better management of patients. From an analysis perspective, there are several ways to approach RNA-seq data to unravel differential transcript usage, such as annotation-based exon-level counting, differential analysis of t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
198
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(206 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
8
198
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies have shown that the utilization of a reduced, expressed transcriptome as reference for short-read mapping instead of the total reference dramatically impacts transcriptome quantification (Mezlini et al 2013;Soneson et al 2016) and improves replicability of expression level estimates (Au et al 2013). We sought to investigate how the new transcripts impact quantification by short reads.…”
Section: Novel Transcripts Have a Major Impact On Accurate Transcriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have shown that the utilization of a reduced, expressed transcriptome as reference for short-read mapping instead of the total reference dramatically impacts transcriptome quantification (Mezlini et al 2013;Soneson et al 2016) and improves replicability of expression level estimates (Au et al 2013). We sought to investigate how the new transcripts impact quantification by short reads.…”
Section: Novel Transcripts Have a Major Impact On Accurate Transcriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are various methods designed explicitly to detect DS based on samples from different experimental conditions 19, 22, 23 . Independently, a set of methods was developed for detecting genetic variation associated with changes in splicing (sQTLs).…”
Section: Approaches To Ds and Sqtl Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, detection of more complex transcript variations remains a challenge for exon junction or PSI methods (see Figure S5 in the paper by Ongen et al 27 ). Soneson et al 23 considered counting which accommodates various types of local splicing events, such as exon paths traced out by paired reads, junction counts or events that correspond to combinations of isoforms; in general, the default exon-based counting resulted in strongest performance for DS gene detection.…”
Section: Approaches To Ds and Sqtl Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used recently published sets of simulated data (Soneson et al, 2016) to compare the performances of the three approaches. They consist of six sets of human RNAseq data (two triplicates) where differential splicing has been introduced for a thousand of genes.…”
Section: Comparison Of Exon-centric and Junction-centric Approaches Omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soneson and colleagues (Soneson et al, 2016) generated simulated fastq files corresponding to 2 x 3 samples where a thousand genes are differentially spliced between two conditions (array express repository E-MTAB-3766). These 1000 protein-coding genes (ENSG) correspond to the positive sets, and we used them to assess the discriminative power of the different approaches with several rates of annotation degradation.…”
Section: Analysis On Simulated Datamentioning
confidence: 99%