1973
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3115(73)90005-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isochronal recovery of fast neutron irradiated metals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
24
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that the neutron resonance cross-section for the PHITS results disagrees with the KIT data because of the different meshes of neutron energy. Table 2 summarizes displacement cross-sections in aluminum and copper that were irradiated with fast neutrons [23] and 14-MeV neutrons [24], and in copper and tungsten that were irradiated with 1.1-and 1.94-GeV protons [3,25]. For the PHITS calculations, the cross-section σ BCA-MD for aluminum was derived with the averaged η as given in [19] because the equation of η with the energy dependence for aluminum was not found in the literature search [19].…”
Section: Calculation Of Displacement Cross-sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Note that the neutron resonance cross-section for the PHITS results disagrees with the KIT data because of the different meshes of neutron energy. Table 2 summarizes displacement cross-sections in aluminum and copper that were irradiated with fast neutrons [23] and 14-MeV neutrons [24], and in copper and tungsten that were irradiated with 1.1-and 1.94-GeV protons [3,25]. For the PHITS calculations, the cross-section σ BCA-MD for aluminum was derived with the averaged η as given in [19] because the equation of η with the energy dependence for aluminum was not found in the literature search [19].…”
Section: Calculation Of Displacement Cross-sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The peak structure is seen at around 13.5 cm corresponding to the stopping Table 2. The calculated and experimental displacement cross-sections in aluminum and copper irradiated with fast neutrons [23] and 14-MeV neutrons [24], and in copper and tungsten irradiated with 1.1-and 1.94-GeV protons [3,25]. For the PHITS calculations, the cross-section σ BCA-MD for aluminum was derived with the averaged η given as in [19].…”
Section: Tef-t Target Assemblymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measure of radiation damage in material is DPA (Displacements per Atom). Based on the cryogenic irradiation experiments [14], it is expected that the RRR of Al stabilizer will degrade to the minimum allowed value of 100 in one year of operation. At that point, the magnet will need to be thermo-cycled as the resistivity of Al recovers to its non-irradiated value after warming up to the room temperature [14].…”
Section: Radiation Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The magnet will be equipped with the witness samples made of Al and Cu, placed at the strategic locations on the inner cold mass surface. Once the critical degradation is detected, the magnet will be thermo-cycled by warming up to the room temperature that restores 100% of the original resistivity in Al and ~87% of that in Cu [5]- [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%