1998
DOI: 10.1006/jcht.1998.0368
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isobaric enthalpy increment and isenthalpic Joule–Thomson effect measurements on synthetic gas containing binary, or ternary mixtures of methane, ethane, propane, and nitrogen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the gaseous enthalpy, Grini et al (Grini et al, 1998) once issued experimental isobaric enthalpy difference for binary mixture nitrogen-methane at 170-260 K and 0.9-7.0 MPa, and simultaneously compared them with those values of SRK equation of state (Soave, 1972) in which the involved ideal gas enthalpy is calculated with API correlation (API, 1983). Their comparison shows that SRK equation can represent the measurements with reasonable accuracy except in the critical region.…”
Section: (3) Gas Enthalpymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the gaseous enthalpy, Grini et al (Grini et al, 1998) once issued experimental isobaric enthalpy difference for binary mixture nitrogen-methane at 170-260 K and 0.9-7.0 MPa, and simultaneously compared them with those values of SRK equation of state (Soave, 1972) in which the involved ideal gas enthalpy is calculated with API correlation (API, 1983). Their comparison shows that SRK equation can represent the measurements with reasonable accuracy except in the critical region.…”
Section: (3) Gas Enthalpymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A feasible operating procedure could consist of producing a throttling expansion in a flow calorimeter. A shortcoming for this technique is that the combined appropriate use of both flow rate and pressure cannot be obtained with a sufficient precision at pressures exceeding 30 MPa . Besides this instrumental limitation, the fundamental reason to refuse this method remains in the JTC value itself.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A shortcoming for this technique is that the combined appropriate use of both flow rate and pressure cannot be obtained with a sufficient precision at pressures exceeding 30 MPa. 5 Besides this instrumental limitation, the fundamental reason to refuse this method remains in the JTC value itself. Near the inversion zone, the vanishing JTC values imply that even large pressure differences lead to very small thermal effects, which, unfortunately, cannot be detected with reliable accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%