2012
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.24369
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ISMRM workshop on fat–water separation: Insights, applications and progress in MRI

Abstract: Approximately 130 attendees convened on February 19–22, 2012 for the first ISMRM‐sponsored workshop on water–fat imaging. The motivation to host this meeting was driven by the increasing number of research publications on this topic over the past decade. The scientific program included an historical perspective and a discussion of the clinical relevance of water–fat MRI, a technical description of multiecho pulse sequences, a review of data acquisition and reconstruction algorithms, a summary of the confoundin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
206
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 156 publications
(208 citation statements)
references
References 148 publications
(149 reference statements)
0
206
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, MR-based fat quantification methods such as IDEAL IQ face a number of confounding factors such as bias [77], [78], decay [79], [78], multiple fat peaks [80], [78], noise bias [77], and eddy currents [81]. Furthermore, these techniques actually measure proton density fat fraction, which is correlated, but not equivalent, to true mass fat fraction [82]. With this in mind, Fig.…”
Section: B Results Of Lfq Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, MR-based fat quantification methods such as IDEAL IQ face a number of confounding factors such as bias [77], [78], decay [79], [78], multiple fat peaks [80], [78], noise bias [77], and eddy currents [81]. Furthermore, these techniques actually measure proton density fat fraction, which is correlated, but not equivalent, to true mass fat fraction [82]. With this in mind, Fig.…”
Section: B Results Of Lfq Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past few years, more sensitive and specific MRI methods have been developed for fat quantification [8]. These do not rely on T1, T2 or T2* but instead use the characteristic proton frequency signature of water and fat molecules (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It allows also quantitative fat measurement, which is an important MRI biomarker in diabetes and obesity [155] with applications in the heart, liver, pancreas, abdomen, spine, pelvis, and muscles.…”
Section: Co 2 Bold Technique and Perfusion Reserve Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%