2003
DOI: 10.1353/trd.2003.0006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isidore of Seville's Taxonomy of Magicians and Diviners

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Magical methods of contacting the dead tended to seek practical information (as Anna Megerler did), rather than simply finding out what had happened to them: the early medieval writer Isidore of Seville, whose definitions of magic influenced many later writers, defined 'necromancy' as [bringing] 'the dead back to life to prophesy and answer questions [my emphasis]'. 37 The exempla which present making agreements to return as legitimate, by contrast, only ask about their friend's condition in the afterlife, although the dead friend sometimes offers other information, such as the dead man's revelation in Thomas of Cantimpre's collection that he had been right to refuse a bishopric while alive because in that position, he would have risked damnation. 38 These exempla do not say explicitly that their protagonists asked their friends to return for the right reasons, but exempla and confession manuals were produced in the same settings, by friars and other churchmen engaged in pastoral care, so that the contents of one set of sources would probably have been known to the authors of the other.…”
Section: Magicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Magical methods of contacting the dead tended to seek practical information (as Anna Megerler did), rather than simply finding out what had happened to them: the early medieval writer Isidore of Seville, whose definitions of magic influenced many later writers, defined 'necromancy' as [bringing] 'the dead back to life to prophesy and answer questions [my emphasis]'. 37 The exempla which present making agreements to return as legitimate, by contrast, only ask about their friend's condition in the afterlife, although the dead friend sometimes offers other information, such as the dead man's revelation in Thomas of Cantimpre's collection that he had been right to refuse a bishopric while alive because in that position, he would have risked damnation. 38 These exempla do not say explicitly that their protagonists asked their friends to return for the right reasons, but exempla and confession manuals were produced in the same settings, by friars and other churchmen engaged in pastoral care, so that the contents of one set of sources would probably have been known to the authors of the other.…”
Section: Magicmentioning
confidence: 99%