“…Hiernaux's perspectives are relevant to the creators of ancient Nile Valley culture, which is an integral part of, and originated in a larger African context (Frankfort, 1950;Childe, 1953;de Heinzelin, 1962;Arkell and Ucko, 1965;Fairman, 1965;Clark, 1970;Shaw, 1976;Vercoutter, 1978;Aldred, 1978;Hassan, 1988), and is not simply a part of, or a corridor to or from the "Mediterranean world"-a cultural construct with limited explanatory power today, as noted by Herzfeld (1984), and almost certainly less in the early Holocene. "Mediterranean," connoting a "race," "one interbreeding population," at the craniometric level, is questionable as defining the "Middle East" during the Bronze Age (Finkel, 1974(Finkel, ,1978, invalid as a term linking geography to a uniform external phenotype (see Snowden, 1970;MacGaffey, 1966;Keita, 1990), inaccurate as a metric taxon for many groups previously assigned to it (Rightmire, 1975a,b), and problematic as a bony craniofacial morphotype denoting a "race" or mendelian population because of its varied soft-part trait associations and wide geographical distribution (see "Hamitic" in Coon et al, 1950;Gabel, 1966;MacGaffey, 1966;Hiernaux, 1975;Rightmire, 1975a).…”