1962
DOI: 10.1038/scientificamerican0662-105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ishango

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
2

Year Published

1972
1972
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
17
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Hiernaux's perspectives are relevant to the creators of ancient Nile Valley culture, which is an integral part of, and originated in a larger African context (Frankfort, 1950;Childe, 1953;de Heinzelin, 1962;Arkell and Ucko, 1965;Fairman, 1965;Clark, 1970;Shaw, 1976;Vercoutter, 1978;Aldred, 1978;Hassan, 1988), and is not simply a part of, or a corridor to or from the "Mediterranean world"-a cultural construct with limited explanatory power today, as noted by Herzfeld (1984), and almost certainly less in the early Holocene. "Mediterranean," connoting a "race," "one interbreeding population," at the craniometric level, is questionable as defining the "Middle East" during the Bronze Age (Finkel, 1974(Finkel, ,1978, invalid as a term linking geography to a uniform external phenotype (see Snowden, 1970;MacGaffey, 1966;Keita, 1990), inaccurate as a metric taxon for many groups previously assigned to it (Rightmire, 1975a,b), and problematic as a bony craniofacial morphotype denoting a "race" or mendelian population because of its varied soft-part trait associations and wide geographical distribution (see "Hamitic" in Coon et al, 1950;Gabel, 1966;MacGaffey, 1966;Hiernaux, 1975;Rightmire, 1975a).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hiernaux's perspectives are relevant to the creators of ancient Nile Valley culture, which is an integral part of, and originated in a larger African context (Frankfort, 1950;Childe, 1953;de Heinzelin, 1962;Arkell and Ucko, 1965;Fairman, 1965;Clark, 1970;Shaw, 1976;Vercoutter, 1978;Aldred, 1978;Hassan, 1988), and is not simply a part of, or a corridor to or from the "Mediterranean world"-a cultural construct with limited explanatory power today, as noted by Herzfeld (1984), and almost certainly less in the early Holocene. "Mediterranean," connoting a "race," "one interbreeding population," at the craniometric level, is questionable as defining the "Middle East" during the Bronze Age (Finkel, 1974(Finkel, ,1978, invalid as a term linking geography to a uniform external phenotype (see Snowden, 1970;MacGaffey, 1966;Keita, 1990), inaccurate as a metric taxon for many groups previously assigned to it (Rightmire, 1975a,b), and problematic as a bony craniofacial morphotype denoting a "race" or mendelian population because of its varied soft-part trait associations and wide geographical distribution (see "Hamitic" in Coon et al, 1950;Gabel, 1966;MacGaffey, 1966;Hiernaux, 1975;Rightmire, 1975a).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To put prime numbers into context, let's begin by saying anecdotally, as late as 20,000 years ago humans marked the bone of Ishango with 19, 17, 13, 11 [4] and 2300 years ago Euclid proved that there are infinitely many prime numbers (e.g. Williamson, 1782) [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bone has what appear to be tallying marks on it, notches carved in groups. Its discoverer, De Heinzelin, interpreted the patterns of notches as an "arithmetical game of some sort, devised by a people who had a number system based on 10 as well as a knowledge of duplication and of prime numbers" [145,110]. Marshack [200], however, explained the bone as an early lunar phase count.…”
Section: The Beginningsmentioning
confidence: 99%