2020
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.2004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ischemic and Bleeding Events Among Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome Associated With Low-Dose Prasugrel vs Standard-Dose Clopidogrel Treatment

Abstract: IMPORTANCE Prasugrel was approved at a lower dose in 2014 in Japan than in the West because East Asian patients are considered more susceptible to bleeding than Western patients. However, real-world outcomes with low-dose prasugrel treatment remain unclear. OBJECTIVE To investigate the association of low-dose prasugrel vs standard-dose clopidogrel administration with short-term outcomes among patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICI… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We judged the risk of bias as high in one RCT (16.7%) due to inadequate information about allocation concealment in the randomization process [30]. The risk of bias in three observational studies (50.0%) was considered moderate [12,13,35], and the other three studies (50.0%) were considered to have serious risk of bias due to the existence of possible confounds ( Figure S1) [32][33][34], MACE MACE was reported in six RCTs (n = 6020) [10,11,[28][29][30][31], and ve observational studies (n = 7081) [13,[32][33][34][35]. There was no difference in the risk of MACE between patients receiving low-dose prasugrel and patients receiving clopidogrel (RR 1.02, 95%CI 0.91 to 1.14; Fig.…”
Section: Risk Of Biasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We judged the risk of bias as high in one RCT (16.7%) due to inadequate information about allocation concealment in the randomization process [30]. The risk of bias in three observational studies (50.0%) was considered moderate [12,13,35], and the other three studies (50.0%) were considered to have serious risk of bias due to the existence of possible confounds ( Figure S1) [32][33][34], MACE MACE was reported in six RCTs (n = 6020) [10,11,[28][29][30][31], and ve observational studies (n = 7081) [13,[32][33][34][35]. There was no difference in the risk of MACE between patients receiving low-dose prasugrel and patients receiving clopidogrel (RR 1.02, 95%CI 0.91 to 1.14; Fig.…”
Section: Risk Of Biasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is in line with our previous report that patients undergoing PCI in Japan were of advanced age and had a lower BMI than those in the United States [ 29 ]. Despite these modifications in the HBR criteria, prasugrel has been predominantly used in Japan (approximately 70–80% of patients with ACS undergoing PCI) [ 30 , 31 ].…”
Section: Importance Of Bleeding Risk Assessment In East Asian Patimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As in Western countries, clopidogrel, in addition to aspirin, has been traditionally used after stent implantation in East Asian patients with ACS [ 32 , 33 , 34 ]. More recently, prasugrel and ticagrelor have also been introduced as potent P2Y12 inhibitors [ 30 , 31 , 35 ]. Clinical studies regarding the selection of P2Y12 inhibitors among patients with ACS conducted in East Asian countries are summarized in Table 2 .…”
Section: Optimal Antithrombotic Regimen In East Asian Patients Witmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations