2008
DOI: 10.1007/s10633-008-9155-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ISCEV Standard for full-field clinical electroretinography (2008 update)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

15
528
1
22

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 846 publications
(569 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
15
528
1
22
Order By: Relevance
“…ERG amplitudes were measured according to a method described previously. 22 In brief, the amplitude of the a-wave was measured from baseline to trough and the b-wave from the trough of the a-wave to the highest peak of the b-wave. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ERG amplitudes were measured according to a method described previously. 22 In brief, the amplitude of the a-wave was measured from baseline to trough and the b-wave from the trough of the a-wave to the highest peak of the b-wave. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It includes guidelines for technical procedures that ensure the reproducibility of ERGs. These guidelines are updated every few years (Marmor et al 2009). …”
Section: Historymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The usefulness of ERG in the diagnostics of retinal diseases has been confirmed in numerous publications (see, for example, the excellent reviews by Ofri (2002) and Ekesten (2013)). In order to provide guidelines for ERG examinations in dogs, the ECVO proposed a protocol for clinical canine ERGs (Narfstrom et al 2002) that was similar to the ISCEV protocol (Marmor et al 2009). They still required the implementation of procedures that significantly diverge from those used in humans, e.g.…”
Section: Historymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The determination of normal ERG values is of great importance for clinical practice, considering that there are numerous intrinsic and extrinsic factors influencing the ERG recordings including the age and breeds of the animal (Itoh et al, 2010), the environment and body temperature (Mizota and Adachi-Usami, 2002), pupil diameter, intraocular pressure and eye movement (Marmor et al, 2009;Grozdanic et al, 2010;Nair et al, 2011), electrode type and position (Mentzer et al, 2005), stage of retinal dark adaptation (Maehara et al, 2015), anesthesia technique (Norman et al, 2008;Lin et al, 2009). All of that contribute to interfere with the values obtained from ERG recording; therefore, the investigations aiming to establish a normal range still continue.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%