Abstract:The optimal approach to treat invasive fungal disease (IFD) caused by more than one fungal species is unknown. We documented the efficacy and safety of isavuconazole for treatment of IFDs caused by more than one fungal species. VITAL was a single-arm, international, open-label study evaluating the efficacy and safety of isavuconazole (200 mg orally or intravenously every 8 hours for 48 hours, then once daily) for treatment of rare IFDs. The primary outcome was the overall response at Day 42; key secondary outc… Show more
“…Among patients with other emerging fungal infections, more than half of evaluable patients responded by EOT . The overall success rate at EOT was considerably less for patients with mixed fungal infections; still, two‐thirds of patients in this group were confirmed alive at the end of the study . In patients with IA, the rate of treatment success overall at EOT (8/24 [33.3%]) was similar to that observed with isavuconazole in patients with proven and probable IFD in the SECURE trial (35%), and was highest in the subgroup of patients without renal impairment (66.7%).…”
Section: Overview Of Results From the Vital Trialmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…or dimorphic fungi, 26 patients with IFD caused by other rare moulds or yeasts, 15 patients with IFD caused by multiple (mixed) fungal species and 24 patients with IA and renal impairment at enrolment. Patients with IFD caused by multiple fungal species were not specifically targeted for enrolment but were allowed to participate at the discretion of the investigator(s) (see accompanying article). After the protocol amendment redefining renal impairment on the basis of eGFR instead of CrCl (see previous section), 4 of the 24 patients initially categorised as having renal impairment were omitted from that analysis population (Table ).…”
Section: Overview Of Results From the Vital Trialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common underlying condition in these patients was diabetes mellitus (5 of 38 patients) and no underlying condition was identified in half of this patient group. Data regarding risk factors for infections with other fungal species reported in the accompanying articles are also comparatively limited. A recent analysis of data from the literature found that the most common underlying risk factor for fusariosis was haematological malignancy, which was consistent with the most common underlying risk factors observed in the VITAL trial in patients with fusariosis alone .…”
Section: Overview Of Results From the Vital Trialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The VITAL trial was designed and conducted to determine the efficacy and safety of isavuconazole (active moiety of the prodrug isavuconazonium sulphate) for the treatment of IA in patients with renal impairment, or in patients with IFDs caused by rare moulds, including Mucorales spp., yeasts or dimorphic fungi. This article provides an overview of the planning, performance, challenges and lessons of the VITAL trial, which has previously reported the efficacy and safety of isavuconazole for the treatment of mucormycosis, cryptococcosis and other endemic mycoses, other rare moulds and yeasts and mixed fungal infections …”
Invasive fungal disease (IFD) confers a substantial risk for morbidity and mortality to immunocompromised patients. Invasive aspergillosis (IA) is the most common IFD caused by moulds but the prevalence of other rare mould diseases, such as mucormycosis, hyalohyphomycosis and phaeohyphomycosis, may be increasing. Treatments are available for IA, but evidence to support efficacy and safety of antifungal agents for rare IFDs, or for IFDs in special patient populations, is limited or lacking. The VITAL trial was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of isavuconazole for the treatment of patients with IA and renal impairment, or with IFDs caused by rare moulds, yeasts or dimorphic fungi. These patients stand to benefit most from a new treatment option but are unlikely to be included in a randomised, controlled trial. In this article, we review the challenges faced in the design and conduct of the VITAL trial. We also review the findings of VITAL, which included evidence of the efficacy and safety of isavuconazole. Finally, we consider the importance of trials such as VITAL to inform therapeutic decision making for clinicians faced with the challenge of treating patients with rare IFDs and as one paradigm of how to determine efficacy and safety of new drugs for rare and resistant infections without a suitable comparator.
“…Among patients with other emerging fungal infections, more than half of evaluable patients responded by EOT . The overall success rate at EOT was considerably less for patients with mixed fungal infections; still, two‐thirds of patients in this group were confirmed alive at the end of the study . In patients with IA, the rate of treatment success overall at EOT (8/24 [33.3%]) was similar to that observed with isavuconazole in patients with proven and probable IFD in the SECURE trial (35%), and was highest in the subgroup of patients without renal impairment (66.7%).…”
Section: Overview Of Results From the Vital Trialmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…or dimorphic fungi, 26 patients with IFD caused by other rare moulds or yeasts, 15 patients with IFD caused by multiple (mixed) fungal species and 24 patients with IA and renal impairment at enrolment. Patients with IFD caused by multiple fungal species were not specifically targeted for enrolment but were allowed to participate at the discretion of the investigator(s) (see accompanying article). After the protocol amendment redefining renal impairment on the basis of eGFR instead of CrCl (see previous section), 4 of the 24 patients initially categorised as having renal impairment were omitted from that analysis population (Table ).…”
Section: Overview Of Results From the Vital Trialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common underlying condition in these patients was diabetes mellitus (5 of 38 patients) and no underlying condition was identified in half of this patient group. Data regarding risk factors for infections with other fungal species reported in the accompanying articles are also comparatively limited. A recent analysis of data from the literature found that the most common underlying risk factor for fusariosis was haematological malignancy, which was consistent with the most common underlying risk factors observed in the VITAL trial in patients with fusariosis alone .…”
Section: Overview Of Results From the Vital Trialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The VITAL trial was designed and conducted to determine the efficacy and safety of isavuconazole (active moiety of the prodrug isavuconazonium sulphate) for the treatment of IA in patients with renal impairment, or in patients with IFDs caused by rare moulds, including Mucorales spp., yeasts or dimorphic fungi. This article provides an overview of the planning, performance, challenges and lessons of the VITAL trial, which has previously reported the efficacy and safety of isavuconazole for the treatment of mucormycosis, cryptococcosis and other endemic mycoses, other rare moulds and yeasts and mixed fungal infections …”
Invasive fungal disease (IFD) confers a substantial risk for morbidity and mortality to immunocompromised patients. Invasive aspergillosis (IA) is the most common IFD caused by moulds but the prevalence of other rare mould diseases, such as mucormycosis, hyalohyphomycosis and phaeohyphomycosis, may be increasing. Treatments are available for IA, but evidence to support efficacy and safety of antifungal agents for rare IFDs, or for IFDs in special patient populations, is limited or lacking. The VITAL trial was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of isavuconazole for the treatment of patients with IA and renal impairment, or with IFDs caused by rare moulds, yeasts or dimorphic fungi. These patients stand to benefit most from a new treatment option but are unlikely to be included in a randomised, controlled trial. In this article, we review the challenges faced in the design and conduct of the VITAL trial. We also review the findings of VITAL, which included evidence of the efficacy and safety of isavuconazole. Finally, we consider the importance of trials such as VITAL to inform therapeutic decision making for clinicians faced with the challenge of treating patients with rare IFDs and as one paradigm of how to determine efficacy and safety of new drugs for rare and resistant infections without a suitable comparator.
“…For targeted first line treatment of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis isavuconazole or voriconazole with therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is recommended (five points) . Voriconazole target plasma trough range is 1‐5.5 mg/L .…”
Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis is a serious threat to immunocompromised and critical care patients. Recent detailed guidelines and treatment algorithms lead microbiologists and clinicians in diagnosis and treatment of invasive aspergillosis. Currently, there is no tool available that allows to measure guideline adherence. To develop such a tool, we reviewed current guidelines provided by five scientific societies (European Society for Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, European Confederation of Medical Mycology, European Respiratory Society, Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), and Infectious Diseases Working Party of the German Society for Hematology and Medical Oncology) and selected the strongest recommendations for management as key components for our scoring tool. We integrated diagnostic measures (chest computed tomography, bronchoalveolar lavage with galactomannan, fungal culture, fungal polymerase chain reaction analysis, species identification, susceptibility testing, histology with silver stain, Periodic acid-Schiff staining, and molecular diagnostics), treatment (antifungal choice and therapeutic drug monitoring), and follow-up computed tomography. The EQUAL Aspergillosis Score 2018 aggregates and weighs the components and provides a tool to support antifungal stewardship and to quantify guideline adherence.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.