2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.surge.2016.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is treatment de-escalation a reality in HPV related oropharyngeal cancer?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…16 These tumors are being recognized as a distinct clinical entity with unique biological behavior, and because of their significantly superior sensitivity to, and hence better prognosis after, chemoradiation, there has been growing enthusiasm for investigating the feasibility and safety of the de-escalation of treatment for HPVrelated cancer in the head and neck region. [17][18][19] As mentioned, HPV-related OPSCC with p16 overexpression is significantly more radiosensitive and carries a better prognosis compared with its non-HPVrelated counterpart. Because of the close proximity of the nasopharynx to the oropharynx, the possible role of HPV in NPC and its potential effect on treatment outcome has drawn much attention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…16 These tumors are being recognized as a distinct clinical entity with unique biological behavior, and because of their significantly superior sensitivity to, and hence better prognosis after, chemoradiation, there has been growing enthusiasm for investigating the feasibility and safety of the de-escalation of treatment for HPVrelated cancer in the head and neck region. [17][18][19] As mentioned, HPV-related OPSCC with p16 overexpression is significantly more radiosensitive and carries a better prognosis compared with its non-HPVrelated counterpart. Because of the close proximity of the nasopharynx to the oropharynx, the possible role of HPV in NPC and its potential effect on treatment outcome has drawn much attention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Up to 70% of patients with oropharyngeal cancer have HPV detected in the genomic DNA of the tumor cells, and 90% of these are associated with the high‐risk HPV types, particularly type 16 . These tumors are being recognized as a distinct clinical entity with unique biological behavior, and because of their significantly superior sensitivity to, and hence better prognosis after, chemoradiation, there has been growing enthusiasm for investigating the feasibility and safety of the de‐escalation of treatment for HPV‐related cancer in the head and neck region …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ECOG 3311 is a phase II trial de-escalating adjuvant radiotherapy (50 Gy compared to 60 Gy) in the case of intermediate risk including patients with less than 1 mm extracapsular extension and 2–4 positive lymph node metastases or close margins [24]. So far, there are no worldwide recommendations for reduction of therapy agents and we need to anticipate the results of the de-escalation trials to adjust the therapy for oropharyngeal cancer patients [26]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, an additional ramification from this work is that male Appalachian or other populations with multi-factorial oropharyngeal tobacco exposure may actually be under-staged using current AJCC-8 guidelines. This is an important consideration, since National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines recommend staging and treatment dependent on p16 status 52 , 54 , where treatment de-escalation of HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancers continues to be evaluated 55 57 . Future efforts towards definitively determining the extent of HPV involvement in Appalachian OC/P and oropharynx through comprehensive p16 staining and PCR 58 will be required to better clarify the predominant factors underlying oropharynx-driven, stage-based disparities in past and future Appalachian cohorts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%