“…The biggest advantage of a robotic approach to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), even if restricted to conduits takedown, is indeed the availability to harvest bilateral internal thoracic arteries while avoiding sternotomy and aortic manipulations, which may improve the functional recovery of the patient. 3 , 4 However, there remain concerns regarding a greater incidence of transfusions, rare but eventful conversions to sternotomy or thoracotomy, early graft failure and reinterventions, 5 , 6 a similar rate of mortality, stroke, atrial fibrillation, and renal failure compared with conventional CABG. 3 Costs are also high, with an initial investment exceeding several millions US dollars and additional operational costs between $100,000 and $150,000 per annum.…”