2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2008.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is thrombin generation the new rapid, reliable and relevant pharmacological tool for the development of anticoagulant drugs?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
53
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
9
53
1
Order By: Relevance
“…31 Enoxaparin (Sanofi-Aventis) was used at 0.2 U/mL; and hirudin, a thrombin inhibitor (Sigma-Aldrich) was used at 5 to 20 U/mL, doses used previously to block thrombin generation or prolong activated clotting time and APPT. [32][33][34] …”
Section: Coagulation Inhibitorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…31 Enoxaparin (Sanofi-Aventis) was used at 0.2 U/mL; and hirudin, a thrombin inhibitor (Sigma-Aldrich) was used at 5 to 20 U/mL, doses used previously to block thrombin generation or prolong activated clotting time and APPT. [32][33][34] …”
Section: Coagulation Inhibitorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…29 Compared with the PT assay, the TG test appears to be more reliable and to more directly reflect bleeding, at least in patients with various coagulation factor deficiencies. 26,30,46 When the sensitivity and quality control of the TG assay are optimized with modifications to minimize variability, 31,42,47 as in the case of the current trial, then TG may provide a more accurate measure of coagulation status. Technologic advancements have also increased the relevance of TEG in the clinical assessment of bleeding and thrombotic conditions 32 and in the monitoring of clot dynamics of both rFVIIa and antagonists to rFVIIa.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24 Clotting assays (eg, aPTT, PT, and INR) have shown limited correlation to bleeding, because they are ex vivo assessments performed in citrated plasma lacking activated platelets. [25][26][27][28] Further, they only describe the initial stage of coagulation. In contrast, TEG can provide continuous coagulation profiles of clot formation in whole blood from initiation to final clot strength, whereas TG can determine the ability to generate the central coagulation enzyme, thrombin.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The coagulation cascade is triggered by the tissue factor pathway by addition of tissue factor, phospholipids, and calcium chloride, eliminating interference from in vitro contact factor activation, and providing the optimum reagent conditions for using CAT as a global test for hemostasis assessment in clinical practice [14]. This assay is known to detect even minor alterations of coagulation, and is sensitive enough to test thrombin activity after anticoagulants such as hirudin [20], heparin [21,22], and novel antithrombin agents including melagatran [23,24], and ximelagatran [24]. Therefore, some comparative studies of the impact of various antithrombins on thrombin indices are warranted as well.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%