2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00688.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is Thirty‐Day Hospital Mortality Really Lower for Black Veterans Compared with White Veterans?

Abstract: Objective. To examine the source of observed lower risk-adjusted mortality for blacks than whites within the Veterans Affairs (VA) system by accounting for hospital site where treated, potential under-reporting of black deaths, discretion on hospital admission, quality improvement efforts, and interactions by age group. Data Sources. Data are from the VA Patient Treatment File on 406,550 hospitalizations of veterans admitted with a principal diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction, stroke, hip fracture, gastr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
49
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(58 reference statements)
4
49
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Several prior analyses have found similar results of a short-term survival advantage among blacks compared with whites for cardiac and noncardiac conditions. [13][14][15]24,25 One possibility for these findings in black patients may be the higher prevalence of type 2 or secondary MIs seen in the setting of renal failure or hypertensive disease. These MIs are caused by increased oxygen demand or decreased oxygen supply rather than acute plaque rupture 26 and are often associated with smaller infarct size and less myocardial damage as evidenced by lower troponin elevations.…”
Section: Short-term Mortalitymentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several prior analyses have found similar results of a short-term survival advantage among blacks compared with whites for cardiac and noncardiac conditions. [13][14][15]24,25 One possibility for these findings in black patients may be the higher prevalence of type 2 or secondary MIs seen in the setting of renal failure or hypertensive disease. These MIs are caused by increased oxygen demand or decreased oxygen supply rather than acute plaque rupture 26 and are often associated with smaller infarct size and less myocardial damage as evidenced by lower troponin elevations.…”
Section: Short-term Mortalitymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…differences in short-term survival may also reflect a "survivor effect" in which blacks who survive to age 65 may represent a healthier cohort of patients than white patients of the same age. [13][14][15] It is also unknown whether black patients with larger MIs may be more likely to die before reaching the hospital; therefore, those blacks who are admitted may have less severe disease than whites. In addition to age and sex, there are likely additional unmeasured differences between these groups that confer a protective benefit toward black patients that we have not fully captured or adjusted for.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 However, the current study has advantages of larger sample size (n=4212), longer follow-up (16 years), and using self-defined ethnic groups BC and BA instead of 1 black group in the previous study. 4,22 Potential reasons for explaining survival advantage of black over white include differences in case mix and stroke subtypes, 15 survivorship and selection bias, 23 different methods of risk adjustment, 24 different lengths of outcome assessment, 25 and differential receipt of effective interventions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 Lower mortality among NHB compared to NHW veterans has also been reported in other diseases. 20,21 The exact reasons for these differences are unclear and need to be further studied. However, we can offer the following potential brief explanations: that there are more intensive efforts at treatment and monitoring to improve control, use of more social-professional support, and survivor bias among NHB veterans; or greater likelihood of dual use with more fragmented care and tighter glycemic control with poorer outcomes among NHW veterans.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%