2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.vhri.2019.09.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is There Something Else Beyond Cost-Effectiveness Analysis for Public Health Decision Making?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The literature has suggested that the most common economic method used in the economic evaluation of the MD development is the cost-utility analysis [25][26][27][28], followed by the cost-effectiveness analysis [26,29], and the cost-consequence analysis [27,29]. These findings are consistent with other studies on this topic [30,31].…”
Section: Economic Evaluation Methodssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The literature has suggested that the most common economic method used in the economic evaluation of the MD development is the cost-utility analysis [25][26][27][28], followed by the cost-effectiveness analysis [26,29], and the cost-consequence analysis [27,29]. These findings are consistent with other studies on this topic [30,31].…”
Section: Economic Evaluation Methodssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Foremost in a clinician’s mind is making the best clinical decisions for their patients, and not how those decisions economically affect the wider health system. How the mantra “do no harm” extends from individual patients to the wider health system is a topic of heated debate [ 34 ], as is how cost-effectiveness should be calculated [ 35 ]. However, when two treatments are equally effective clinically but entail different financial costs, then choosing the cheaper treatment should not be controversial.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DM should include many rationalities from a democratic perspective, where economic evaluation is only one input of all possible. 5 It is necessary to strengthen the process of discussion and not only include a new vaccine in the EPI because it is cost-effective. Initiatives to integrate economic studies into the DM process for the introduction of new and underutilized vaccines as ProVac 10 should not displace other criteria at the time of new vaccine introduction discussion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Criteria to decide on vaccine introduction may vary significantly across societies and include society specific values and rationalities beyond economic or monetary inputs. 5 Using a previously discussed reference framework for decision making (DM) in public health, we could identify additional inputs such as scientific evidence, equity, ethics, and political priorities. All of them extended the use of cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) results in a democratic setting where discussion involves different stakeholders and political actors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation