2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2008.00449.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is there equity in oral healthcare utilization: experience after achieving Universal Coverage

Abstract: Notwithstanding the UC policy implementation made impressive strides toward improving of welfare coverage and an increase in accessibility of health services among Thais, inequality and inequity in oral healthcare utilization persist even when the country achieved universal coverage. Decomposition analyses demonstrate the association of each determinant to inequality in utilization which provides information for policy amendment to achieve the goal of equity in healthcare system.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

8
84
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
8
84
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is a significant finding, but it is not surprising in a system where high dental care costs are mostly covered by out-of-pocket payments (Petersen 2003;WHO 2005). This finding is consistent with those of other studies Somkotra and Detsomboonrat 2008). This study illustrated inequality by calculating the concentration index of actual dental care utilization (C M ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This is a significant finding, but it is not surprising in a system where high dental care costs are mostly covered by out-of-pocket payments (Petersen 2003;WHO 2005). This finding is consistent with those of other studies Somkotra and Detsomboonrat 2008). This study illustrated inequality by calculating the concentration index of actual dental care utilization (C M ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…To adjust for size and age structures of households, total household consumption was divided by the adult-equivalence scale. Consistent with previous studies (Deaton 1997;Somkotra and Detsomboonrat 2008), it was defined as e h = (A h + α K h ) θ , where A h is the number of adults in household h and K h is the number of children (0-14 years). Children typically consume less than adults, so counting children as adults may overestimate the living standards of households with children.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 3 more Smart Citations