2021
DOI: 10.1177/1948550620982703
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is There Anything Good About Atheists? Exploring Positive and Negative Stereotypes of the Religious and Nonreligious

Abstract: Negative stereotypes about atheists are widespread, robust, rooted in distrust, and linked to discrimination. Here, we examine whether social perceivers in the United States might additionally hold any positive stereotypes about atheists (and corresponding negative stereotypes of the religious). Experiments 1 ( N = 401) and 2 ( N = 398, preregistered) used methods of intuitive stereotypes (the conjunction fallacy). People tended to stereotype atheists as fun, open-minded, and scientific—even as they harbor ext… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two unexpected correlations emerged indicating perceived proclivity toward infidelity heightened both attractive atheists’ and theists’ desirability in STM. These findings provide continued evidence for a physical attractiveness premium in STM, particularly among those perceived as interested in promiscuous mating strategies, regardless of theism (Jonason & Buss, 2012; Kenrick et al, 1993; Moon et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Two unexpected correlations emerged indicating perceived proclivity toward infidelity heightened both attractive atheists’ and theists’ desirability in STM. These findings provide continued evidence for a physical attractiveness premium in STM, particularly among those perceived as interested in promiscuous mating strategies, regardless of theism (Jonason & Buss, 2012; Kenrick et al, 1993; Moon et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…One third-person statement accompanied each target indicating they were either theistic (i.e., This person believes in God ) or atheistic (i.e., This person does not believe in God ). I designed statements to mirror typical dating site statements where individuals would disclose their religious affiliation as part of a battery of demographics information presented for dating decisions, which were akin to the brief manipulations seen in other research assessing perceptions of atheists’ costs and benefits (e.g., Moon et al, 2021). Theists’ religious affiliation was intentionally nondenominational to reduce the likelihood of homogamy effects influencing preferences beyond the mere espousal of religiosity, given the considerable preferences individuals have for members of their own religious denomination in relationships that sees individuals typically being most interested in mates with the same religious views (e.g., Catholics preferring other Catholics, but not Protestants; Luo, 2009).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Results indicated that people judged others who committed acts of cannibalism, consensual incest, necrobestiality, and serial murder to be more representative of individuals who do not believe in God compared with Christians or Muslims. The finding that people perceive atheists as more likely to engage in immoral behaviors than religious believers has been replicated using the conjunction fallacy paradigm across several countries, suggesting a robust stereotype that is applied to atheists cross-culturally (Gervais et al, 2017;Giddings & Dunn, 2016;Moon et al, 2021). Using other types of methodologies, researchers have demonstrated that atheists are more likely to be associated with immorality than religious believers (Bergstrom et al, 2022;Brown-Iannuzzi et al, 2018;Cook et al, 2015;Harper, 2007).…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%