2013
DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2013.239
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is There Any Place for Spleen Stiffness Measurement in Portal Hypertension?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…found that SS ≥55 kPa rule in both CSPH and EV [21], with very good specificity values. We also found that the same SS value (42.7 kPa) is predictive for both CSPH and large EV, but the performance in a validation cohort was modest (AUROC = 0.633) . The study of Sharma et al .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…found that SS ≥55 kPa rule in both CSPH and EV [21], with very good specificity values. We also found that the same SS value (42.7 kPa) is predictive for both CSPH and large EV, but the performance in a validation cohort was modest (AUROC = 0.633) . The study of Sharma et al .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Collechia et al found that SS ≥55 kPa rule in both CSPH and EV [21], with very good specificity values. We also found that the same SS value (42.7 kPa) is predictive for both CSPH and large EV, but the performance in a validation cohort was modest (AUROC = 0.633) (43). The study of Sharma et al finds significant differences in SSM values in cirrhotic patients without EV (32 kPa), as compared with those with small EV (49 kPa), large EV (56 kPa) or those that bled (58 kPa)(44).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…The use of splenic stiffness measurement as a non-invasive method to detect the presence of clinically significant portal hypertension 10 or of esophageal varices 13 was already suggested, although the models based on SS for the identification of the patients with large varices need to be fully validated. 36,37 SS has been showed to be useful also in patients with portal hypertension due to portal vein obstruction. 18 In addition to the above applications, our findings support the possibility that the modification of portal pressure could be monitored by SS measurement by ARFI imaging.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liver TE measurement accurately estimates the presence of advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis in patients with chronic liver disease (4). However, recent studies further showed that spleen stiffness, measured by transient elastography correlates with hepatic venous pressure gradient (5)(6)(7)(8). Therefore, splenic elastography was shown to identify clinically significant portal hypertension (9)(10)(11)(12).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%