2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.166
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is there an EKC between economic growth and smog pollution in China? New evidence from semiparametric spatial autoregressive models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
62
1
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 155 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
7
62
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the factors related to PM 2.5 concentration, previous studies by Zhang [48], Yun [10], Xie [49], and Ding [50] also showed a significant positive correlation between population density and PM 2.5 ; in addition, Guo and Ding showed that population density is the most important socioeconomic factor affecting PM 2.5 concentration [51,52]. This study also confirms their results with similar findings.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Among the factors related to PM 2.5 concentration, previous studies by Zhang [48], Yun [10], Xie [49], and Ding [50] also showed a significant positive correlation between population density and PM 2.5 ; in addition, Guo and Ding showed that population density is the most important socioeconomic factor affecting PM 2.5 concentration [51,52]. This study also confirms their results with similar findings.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…With the increase of technological level and environmental awareness, people pay more attention to the coordinated development of the economy and the environment. In China, there are related studies that prove this point [ 71 , 72 ]. It is foreseeable that developed regions will reach the inflection point of the inverted “U”-shaped curve early.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…" "环境库兹涅茨曲线 (EKC) " "脱钩 (Decoupling) " "生态效率 (Eco-efficiency) " 和 "耦合协调 (Coupling Coordination)" 为 主 题/关 键 词 , 并 辅 以 "区域(Regional)" "经济增长(Economic Growth)" "资源(Resource)" "环境(Environment)" 等主题/关 [16] 、 增长假说(Pressure-led Growth) [17] 、 互馈假说(Bidi-rectional Causality) [18] 和中立假说(No Causal Relationship) [19] [9] 。例如, 单位根检验技术方面, 当样本 容量较小时, ADF 检验稳健性较好, 而当序列存在 自相关和异方差时, PP 检验稳健性更佳 [20] 。协整检 验技术方面, 有观点认为多变量 J-J 最大似然法优于 双变量 E-G 两步法 [9,21] , 另一种声音则认为没有明确 的证据表明任何一种技术优于其他, 甚至同一数据 集下不同检验技术所得弹性值也存在较大差异 [20] 。 而在数据方面, 学术界已基本达成共识, 认为面板 表 1 区域经济增长与资源环境压力格兰杰因果关系的研究文献 Table 1 Literature on Grainger causal relationship between regional economic growth and resource-environmental pressure 作者 Appiah [9] Alshehry 等 [10] Cowan 等 [11] Yoo 等 [12] Chen 等 [13] 彭新育等 [14] 陈桂月等 [15] 研究期 [22][23][24][25] 。然而, 该假说与其理论解释仍面临 3 个方面 的挑战: 一是仅关注经济增长对资源环境的影响, 忽视了资源环境系统对经济系统的反馈 [26,27] [28][29][30][31][32][33][34] 。深究原因, 一方面 在于资源环境问题具有复杂性、 流动性与扩散性。 例如, 瞬时性、 局域性污染物大多支持 EKC 假说, 而 累积性、 扩散性污染物则多拒绝 [25] 。另一方面在于 研究模型、 方法、 指标及数据等技术性因素的差异, 甚至植根于研究案例资源环境本底、 社会经济条 件、 政治体制、 能源与环境规制等情境的差异 [22,35] [36] 。这可能是由于检验结果 对模型的函数形式及估计技术过于敏感 [37] 。有批评 者认为单一的回归模型不能全面刻画经济与资源 环境系统的关系 [27] 。因此, 有学者构建了包含产业 结构、 技术进步、 国际贸易、 消费偏好、 能源价格、 环 境政策, 甚至社会因素的结构模型, 以揭示曲线形 态变化的 "黑箱" [38,39] Table 2 Literature on environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis between regional economic growt...…”
Section: 引言unclassified