Is there an Archaeological Potential for a Sociology of Landing Sites?

Abstract

Repeatedly, archaeological research on landing sites draws upon the equivalence between a naturally suitable coast and a landing site/harbour. This kind of research emanates from an archaeologically and socially ill-defined landing site concept and has created a basis for arbitrary discussions on the nature of maritime activities of past societies. There is no comprehensive and integrated understanding of the existing variability, character and patterns of landing site behaviour and relations. This article addresses the question of what characterises landing sites for watercrafts in an archaeological and social perspective. If such characteristics can bedefined, what are the possibilities of seeing any of these traits in an archaeological material? Defining a landing site as a contact zone where movements and meetings on land and by watercraft take place and are facilitated by the locality as such, a generally applicable model for the archaeological study of landing sites is suggested and checked against three different archaeological case studies from the Baltic Sea region.

Delivering the Deep: Maritime archaeology for the 21st century: selected papers from IKUWA 7

“…Space as a symbolic construct enables or limits actions as determined by topographical-geomorphological conditions, but which at the same time exceed them. For example, landing sites are water-bound contact zones (Ilves 2011(Ilves : 8-9, 2013.…”