1994
DOI: 10.1097/00000637-199401000-00001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is There a Relationship Between Autoantibodies and Silicone-Gel Implants?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When silicone lymphadenopathy is caused by gel or liquid, some foreign body giant cells may be seen. This difference is as yet unexplained [8,15,17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When silicone lymphadenopathy is caused by gel or liquid, some foreign body giant cells may be seen. This difference is as yet unexplained [8,15,17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…(3)Foreign body granulomas can be observed histopathologically in an injected area and in the draining lymph nodes. (4) The presence of serologic abnormalities such as autoantibodies [15,17]. (5) The symptoms improved after the removal of the foreign material [10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A higher incidence of certain ANA patterns, e.g. anticentromere antibodies, which are associated with scleroderma-related disorders, has been reported in women with silicone breast implants [38]. In patients with the fibromyalgia-related chronic fatigue syndrome, ANA directed to nuclear envelope proteins have been found [40].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ANA reactivity in women with silicone breast implants has been the topic of several studies [9,36,37]. The prevalence of ANA in women with silicone breast implants was reported to be the same as that of control subjects in one study [38], whereas other, uncontrolled studies found ANA in more than half of women with silicone breast implants referred for evaluation of rheumatic complaints [36,39]. However, most studies have addressed small, highly selected groups of patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[45][46][47][48] However, these isolated case reports, which increased in freautoantibodies. 38 However, other investigators found that antibodies to silicone surface-associated antigens quency since the publicity in 1991, have not been viewed in the context of epidemiologic studies and fail are elevated in symptomatic patients with breast implants and that the antibodies are associated with to take a placebo effect into account. It was not until 1992 that case -control studies evaluating the associasymptoms.…”
Section: Silicone and Connective Tissue Diseasesmentioning
confidence: 99%