2021
DOI: 10.1186/s12610-021-00147-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is there a relationship between serum vitamin D and semen parameters? A cross-sectional sample of the Iranian infertile men

Abstract: Background Recent studies suggest that serum vitamin D may be associated with semen parameters. In the present cross-sectional study, we attempted to investigate the association between serum vitamin D levels and semen parameters among Iranian sub-fertile men. Results A total of 350 infertile men recruited for this cross-sectional study using a simple random sampling method with a mean age of 34.77 years old, body mass index of 26.67 kg/m2, serum v… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 43 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Europe and Asia are also undergoing rapid development and are represented by the University of Southampton and Tehran University of Medical Sciences, respectively. Tehran University of Medical Sciences paid more attention to the role of vitamin D in male reproduction ( 88 90 ) and the mechanism by which vitamin D improved female reproductive disorders including endometriosis ( 91 , 92 ), PCOS ( 93 , 94 ), repeated implantation failure ( 51 , 95 ), and endometritis ( 96 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Europe and Asia are also undergoing rapid development and are represented by the University of Southampton and Tehran University of Medical Sciences, respectively. Tehran University of Medical Sciences paid more attention to the role of vitamin D in male reproduction ( 88 90 ) and the mechanism by which vitamin D improved female reproductive disorders including endometriosis ( 91 , 92 ), PCOS ( 93 , 94 ), repeated implantation failure ( 51 , 95 ), and endometritis ( 96 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%