2014
DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.12091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is There a Political Bias? A Computational Analysis of Female Subjects' Coverage in Liberal and Conservative Newspapers

Abstract: Objectives. One possible source for the gap in media coverage between female and male subjects is the political affiliation of the media source. The objective of this present study was to test whether there is a difference between more liberal and more conservative newspapers in coverage rates of female subjects. Methods. We used computational methods to analyze a unique large-scale data set (complied by the Lydia Text Analysis System) and compared the 2010 female coverage rates in 168 newspapers. Results. Con… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
2
12
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings here are supported by manual studies [ 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 ], and earlier automated studies [ 8 , 9 , 10 ], including our own work [ 11 ] where we previously found that the ratio of males to females of the most mentioned entities found that Sports was contained the least balanced among the 1,000 most mentioned entities, with the topic of Fashion being the closest to parity.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our findings here are supported by manual studies [ 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 ], and earlier automated studies [ 8 , 9 , 10 ], including our own work [ 11 ] where we previously found that the ratio of males to females of the most mentioned entities found that Sports was contained the least balanced among the 1,000 most mentioned entities, with the topic of Fashion being the closest to parity.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…These findings confirm those of smaller-scale studies performed using traditional analytical techniques, such as that undertaken by Desmond and Danilewicz [ 32 ] who examined 580 televised news stories, finding that female reporters were more likely to present human interest and health related stories, and that males were significantly more often used as experts than their female counterparts. Similar results have been reported for printed news media [ 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 ], with men writing the majority of the news and are most often quoted or mentioned within the news stories. Other large-scale studies using data-driven approaches, such as that undertaken by Wagner et al [ 33 ], have shown that gender imbalance is also an issue on the web, finding in a selection of 124,824 articles from Wikipedia that while women were featured equally as often as men, the representation of those women was very different from men, often focussing on romantic and family-related issues.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Political leanings may affect both who is being covered and how they are portrayed. Former research suggests that media political slant is not clearly associated the amount of media attention devoted to women versus men (Adkins, Covert, and Wasburn, ; Potter, ; Shor et al., , ). However, it remains plausible that media political leaning is associated with the tone of coverage and its level of negativity.…”
Section: Political Leaning and Media Sentiment: Theory And Research Hmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing research on gender differences in campaign coverage of candidates is mixed in its findings. In their study of newspaper ideology and coverage of woman candidates, Shor et al 22 find that newspapers from across the ideological spectrum cover women candidates significantly less than men running for office. Contrasting these findings, Hayes and Lawless 8 find that women congressional candidates do not face media coverage that differs from that of their men counterparts.…”
Section: Media Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%