2008
DOI: 10.1039/b711896a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is there a future for sequential chemical extraction?

Abstract: Since their introduction in the late 1970s, sequential extraction procedures have experienced a rapid increase in use. They are now applied for a large number of potentially toxic elements in a wide range of sample types. This review uses evidence from the literature to consider the usefulness and limitations of sequential extraction and thereby to assess its future role in environmental chemical analysis. It is not the intention to provide a comprehensive survey of all applications of sequential extractions o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
327
1
14

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 554 publications
(343 citation statements)
references
References 510 publications
(480 reference statements)
1
327
1
14
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the chemistry of mercury requires the development of specific extraction schemes, specifically dedicated to this element (Bacon and Davidson, 2008). Difficulties in the comparison of sequential extraction results for mercury fractionation relate particularly to inconsistencies between different extraction protocols (Bacon and Davidson, 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, the chemistry of mercury requires the development of specific extraction schemes, specifically dedicated to this element (Bacon and Davidson, 2008). Difficulties in the comparison of sequential extraction results for mercury fractionation relate particularly to inconsistencies between different extraction protocols (Bacon and Davidson, 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the chemistry of mercury requires the development of specific extraction schemes, specifically dedicated to this element (Bacon and Davidson, 2008). Difficulties in the comparison of sequential extraction results for mercury fractionation relate particularly to inconsistencies between different extraction protocols (Bacon and Davidson, 2008). It must be underlined that a limitation to the use of sequential extraction procedures in general is the lack of validation and reference materials for checking the performance both of method and the laboratory.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As the fraction extracted from SPM and sediment is operationally defined and because bioavailability towards different invertebrate species is highly complex, some authors criticized the sequential extraction approach (Bacon and Davidson, 2008). As our objective was a general characterization of trace metal distribution and partitioning, this approach allowed comparing sites.…”
Section: Trace Metal Spatial Distribution and Partitioningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data from such analysis are used to compute mobility and bioavailability of metals [9][10][11][12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%