1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0012-821x(98)00095-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is there a first-order discontinuity in the lowermost mantle?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is only marginally consistent with the observed seismic velocity variations [Weber, 1993;Lay et al, 1997;Liu et al, 1998;Castle et al, 2000]. Other factors such as chemical heterogeneities and anisotropy can be more important for seismic velocity variations.…”
Section: Lateral Temperature Variationsmentioning
confidence: 46%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is only marginally consistent with the observed seismic velocity variations [Weber, 1993;Lay et al, 1997;Liu et al, 1998;Castle et al, 2000]. Other factors such as chemical heterogeneities and anisotropy can be more important for seismic velocity variations.…”
Section: Lateral Temperature Variationsmentioning
confidence: 46%
“…Lateral heterogeneities in the D 00 layer are present on scales as small as 100 -300 km. These are associated either with topography of the D 00 discontinuity or lateral variations in seismic velocities in the D 00 layer [Weber, 1993;Lay et al, 1997;Liu et al, 1998]. Anisotropy has also been established in many regions of the D 00 layer [Lay et al, 1998b;Kendall and Silver, 1996;Matzel et al, 1996;Garnero and Lay, 1997].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fact that we observe no evidence for a P wave reflector where there is evidence for a $ wave reflector suggests a chemical (at least partially) origin of the P* and $* phases. Liu et al [1998] propose that these phases are due to strong velocity gradients rather than first order discontinuities [see also Tromp and Dziewonski, 1998]. In this case, P* phases are less likely to exist than $* because P wave velocity variations are smaller than $ wave velocity variations.…”
Section: Error Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason we chose an elliptical geometiy to desclibe the anomalies was the shape of the tomographic fast anornaly and the simplicity of the calc~1lations. So far velocity heterogeneities of only several percent with lateral scale lengths of several h~mdred hlometers in Earth's mid-mantle and lowellnost mantle have been calculated with tomographic rnodels (16,17,19,20). Recently it was fo~lnd that anomalies in the lowermost -100 lulometers of the lnantle (21-24) co~lld be much larger (reductions of 10% or more in P and up to 30% reductions in S velocities).…”
Section: Lower Mantle Lateral Heterogeneity Beneath the Caribbean Seamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently it was fo~lnd that anomalies in the lowermost -100 lulometers of the lnantle (21-24) co~lld be much larger (reductions of 10% or more in P and up to 30% reductions in S velocities). One of the problems of the existing global tomographic rnodels (19)(20)(21) is that they are the res~llt of damped least squares inversions that underestimate the anolnalous velocity gradients and overestimate the width of the heterogeneity. It seems that larger velocity anomalies are possible in confined zones that affect the travel time of P waves (by as much as 1.4 s) and cause the waves to be deflected fiom their normal path.…”
Section: Lower Mantle Lateral Heterogeneity Beneath the Caribbean Seamentioning
confidence: 99%