2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaac.2016.04.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is There a Female Protective Effect Against Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder? Evidence From Two Representative Twin Samples

Abstract: ObjectiveAttention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is more frequent in males than in females. The “female protective effect” posits that females undergo greater exposure to etiological factors than males in order to develop ADHD, leading to the prediction that relatives of females with ADHD will display more ADHD behaviors. We thus tested whether cotwins of females displaying extreme ADHD traits would display more ADHD traits than cotwins of males displaying extreme ADHD traits.MethodParents of approxima… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
41
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
7
41
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We found both weak and insignificant differences between males and females in the effect of PI-PTVs on 4 neurodevelopmental/psychiatric disorders (Supplementary Table 8). Interestingly, we did not observe differences in ADHD-affected males and females, in contrast with the hypothesis that affected females might be enriched for rare deleterious variants 19 . We cannot exclude that differences in the diagnostic criteria used in these European studies compared to those of previous studies, which were mostly conducted in the U.S., might explain these results.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…We found both weak and insignificant differences between males and females in the effect of PI-PTVs on 4 neurodevelopmental/psychiatric disorders (Supplementary Table 8). Interestingly, we did not observe differences in ADHD-affected males and females, in contrast with the hypothesis that affected females might be enriched for rare deleterious variants 19 . We cannot exclude that differences in the diagnostic criteria used in these European studies compared to those of previous studies, which were mostly conducted in the U.S., might explain these results.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…The closer cross‐sectional and longitudinal HCC‐ADHD links in boys than in girls might further characterize the specific pathway of preschool ADHD. Although the predictive effect by HCC did not prove to differ significantly between boys and girls, the closer and significant association in boys fits well with a female protective effect in ADHD described by Taylor et al (), and should thus be taken as a hint for further investigations of HCC in larger samples of children showing ADHD symptoms.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…We found a significant interaction effect between gender and ADHD symptoms on the hair cortisol concentration (HCC) of the child, indicating a negative association between ADHD symptoms and HCC in preschool boys but not in girls (Pauli‐Pott et al, ). We speculated that the identification of the moderator effect by gender was facilitated by the use of HCC, and that the less pronounced link in girls might reflect the female protective effect against ADHD recently described by Taylor et al (): Several genetic and environmental factors explained less variance in ADHD symptoms in girls than in boys. Hence, it seems possible that the putative association between HPA axis activity and an increase in ADHD symptoms is closer in boys than in girls.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Biological sex is an important source of heterogeneity in NDDs [11] and aspects of sex-specific brain structure and functional connectivity patterns have been found in ASD [51] and to a lesser degree in ADHD [52] or OCD [53]. Previous evidence has suggested a protective effect for females, or required increased biological 'hit' related to resilience to developing NDDs [54,55]. However, interpretation of any differences found amongst males versus females in the current study is limited due to the small numbers of represented females with NDDs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%