Is There a Downside to Schedule Control for the Work-Family Interface?

Abstract

Using data from a 2007 U.S. survey of workers, this article examines the implications of schedule control for work-family role blurring and work-family conflict. Four main findings indicate that (a) schedule control is associated with more frequent working at home and work-family multitasking activities; (b) the positive association between schedule control and multitasking suppresses the negative association between schedule control and workfamily conflict; (c) the positive association between working at home and multitasking is weaker among individuals with greater schedule control; and (d) the positive association between work-family multitasking and workfamily conflict is weaker among individuals with greater schedule control. Our findings reveal previously undocumented mediating, suppression, and moderating patterns in the ways that schedule control contributes to work-family role blurring and work-family conflict. The authors discuss the implications of these findings for views of schedule control as a "resource" and theories about the borders in the work-family interface.

Valuing Alternative Work Arrangements

“…36 In the standard labor supply model, the decision to work part-time when a worker is unconstrained is due to a high shadow value of time and/or a low wage. Our estimates suggest that job-seekers by and large prefer working 40 hours, even 34 While not mentioned in our focus group, another potential explanation for some workers actually disliking this type of flexibility is that it could lead to more work-family conflict or higher expectations from family members for home production (e.g., Schieman and Young 2010). 35 This value of time is calculated as the amount the worker has to earn per hour in hours 20 through 40 to be indifferent between the 20 and 40 hour-per-week jobs:…”

Alternative Work Arrangements: Two Images of the New World of Work

“…The physical isolation that can come with working remotely is correlated with feeling less respected by the organization, which weakens organizational identification (Bartel et al 2012). A meta-analysis found that telecommuting can increase work-family conflict due to longer hours (Allen et al 2015) and because it blurs the boundaries between work and family roles (e.g., Schieman & Young 2010, Allen & Shockley 2009, Kossek & Michel 2011. However, paradoxically, telecommuters who are encouraged to create stronger work-life boundaries are less likely to extend themselves in crunch times, possibly increasing the workload of non-telecommuting coworkers (Lautsch et al 2009).…”

Balancing paid work, care and leisure in post-separation households

“…Several researchers (e.g. Ashforth et al, 2000;Bielby and Bielby, 1989;Clark, 2000;Desrochers et al, 2005;Karsten, 1995;Nippert-Eng, 1996;Schieman and Young, 2010) addressing the practice of combining commitments and activities in everyday life recognize that the different domains of life are interconnected and overlapping, which results in people constantly combining different, contemporaneous commitments.…”