2002
DOI: 10.1097/00005053-200206000-00007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is There a Differential Impact of Fatigue and Physical Disability on Quality of Life in Multiple Sclerosis?

Abstract: To investigate the quantitative impact of fatigue on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in multiple sclerosis (MS) and to determine whether fatigue was related to HRQoL independently from bodily disability, data on HRQoL were ascertained for 87 patients with definite MS by using the SF-36. HRQoL scores and subscores were related to the basic MS disability score (EDSS) and further MS parameters, and to fatigue, which was assessed by using different fatigue scales. Factors related to predominantly physical b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
57
3
5

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
9
57
3
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Only the SDMT was retained in the models predicting psychosocial and overall HRQOL, with lower scores on the SDMT significantly predicting poor psychosocial HRQOL and poor overall HRQOL. Our data regarding the EDSS and its relationship with physical components of HRQOL are consistent with previous research, [10][11][12][13][14][15] while the meaning of cognition as a predictor warrants further exploration. The findings suggest the possibility of a greater role for cognitive impairment in HRQOL among MS patients, and require replication in larger patient samples with other HRQOL outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Only the SDMT was retained in the models predicting psychosocial and overall HRQOL, with lower scores on the SDMT significantly predicting poor psychosocial HRQOL and poor overall HRQOL. Our data regarding the EDSS and its relationship with physical components of HRQOL are consistent with previous research, [10][11][12][13][14][15] while the meaning of cognition as a predictor warrants further exploration. The findings suggest the possibility of a greater role for cognitive impairment in HRQOL among MS patients, and require replication in larger patient samples with other HRQOL outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…3,4 This problem is of great interest in the comprehensive care of MS patients, particularly as HRQOL and adjustment to illness may help predict disease progression 4 (eg, through influencing susceptibility to relapses, engagement in positive health behaviors, use of active coping strategies, and so on). Previous research in MS has shown associations between poor HRQOL and progressive disease course, [5][6][7][8][9] greater physical disability, [10][11][12][13][14][15] disease duration, 10 fatigue, 11,12,16,17 and depression. 3,6,[17][18][19][20][21] Of these, physical and cognitive capacity are measured by performance-based reliable measures, and it is not clear which ability domain is most critical for poor HRQOL in MS patients.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This scale was first designated in 1995 for patients suffering from MS. Validity and reliability of this scale have been verified at the correlation-coefficient of 0.86 in foreign and domestic studies (18)(19)(20).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The validity of these results is further strengthened by the fact that the VFQ has been established as a sensitive and useful tool to assess visual function in patients with MS. 42,43 Separate studies have suggested that HRQOL in MS is significantly affected by impairment and disability measured by the EDSS, 3 cognitive impairment, 44 and fatigue. 7 Depression has also been shown to have a strong association with HRQOL in MS, independent of clinical course and disability. [45][46][47] The results of this study corroborated prior evidence, as disability (as measured by the GNDS) and depressive symptoms (as measured by the CESD) both had a strong and significant influence on HRQOL.…”
Section: Factors Affecting Hrqol In Msmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these variables, only neurologic disability, fatigue, and depression have been shown to contribute independently to overall HRQOL. [6][7][8] An association between visual function and HRQOL has also been noted in the literature, 9,10 but visual impairment was not assessed using standardized measures of vision-related health status, such as the Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ). Rather, these studies used the visual subscale of general or functional status measures to correlate with overall QOL scores.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%