2020
DOI: 10.1002/tsm2.200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is there a biomechanically efficient vertical ground reaction force profile for countermovement jumps?

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to determine whether countermovement jump (CMJ) metrics differed based on whether or not peak vertical ground reaction force (GRF) occurred at the lowest point of the countermovement (low position). CMJs from 100 athletes were categorized based on whether or not the peak force occurred at low position and whether they had unimodal or bimodal GRF profiles. CMJ metrics were compared between jump categories and between athletes with above average, average, and below average jump heig… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

8
41
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
8
41
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In these types of analyses, the low position of the center of mass (bottom of the countermovement) represents the end of the braking phase and start of the propulsive phase. However, McHugh et al 4 recently suggested this may not accurately reflect the GRFs obtained during the different phases of the CMJ. It is possible that the peak GRF may occur at the low position of the countermovement, suggesting that peak braking and propulsive phase forces occur at the same point.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In these types of analyses, the low position of the center of mass (bottom of the countermovement) represents the end of the braking phase and start of the propulsive phase. However, McHugh et al 4 recently suggested this may not accurately reflect the GRFs obtained during the different phases of the CMJ. It is possible that the peak GRF may occur at the low position of the countermovement, suggesting that peak braking and propulsive phase forces occur at the same point.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Arguably, the most popular vertical jump test is the countermovement jump (CMJ), which involves a downward countermovement followed by a maximal vertical jump. Recently, it has become more common to assess vertical ground reaction forces (GRFs) during CMJs, typically performed with the hands on the hips, to observe acute changes or differences in vertical jump performance in adults and youth 1‐4 . Previous studies utilizing this technique often report peak braking (eccentric) and peak propulsive (concentric) force, among several other metrics across the phases of the CMJ 5‐9 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Two distinct force-time waveform shapes, consisting of either one peak (unimodal) or two peaks (bimodal), have been observed during the CMJ [24][25][26]. In their analysis of force-time waveforms for 33 athletes, Kennedy and Drake [26] concluded that a bimodal force-time curve was not an optimal shape for jump performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their analysis of force-time waveforms for 33 athletes, Kennedy and Drake [26] concluded that a bimodal force-time curve was not an optimal shape for jump performance. In a similar study on 100 athletes, McHugh et al [25] determined that a peak force occurring at the low position of the COM (amortization phase) was a better indicator of jump performance, as determined by jump height and reactive strength index, than whether the waveform shape was unimodal or bimodal. The findings of the current study are generally in agreement with the conclusions of both Kennedy and Drake and McHugh et al, but may offer more insight into the relationship between waveform shape and jump performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%