2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2022.114127
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is the virus-laden standing water change the transmission intensity of SARS-CoV-2 after precipitation? A framework for empirical studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 49 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, Frutos et al (2022a) published the paper “Origin of COVID-19: Dismissing the Mojiang mine theory and the laboratory accident narrative”, complemented by a second one ( Frutos et al, 2022b ), entitled “ There is no “origin” to SARS-CoV-2”. In turn, He et al (2022) tryed to answer the question “Is the virus-laden standing water change the transmission intensity of SARS-CoV-2 after precipitation?” , while Guérin-Rechdaoui et al (2022) assessed the fate of SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus in wastewater treatment sludge during storage and thermophilic anaerobic digestion. Finally, to close the present VSI, Domingo (2022) published an updated review of the scientific literature on the origin of SARS-CoV-2.…”
Section: Comments On Papers Published In the Virtual Special Issuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, Frutos et al (2022a) published the paper “Origin of COVID-19: Dismissing the Mojiang mine theory and the laboratory accident narrative”, complemented by a second one ( Frutos et al, 2022b ), entitled “ There is no “origin” to SARS-CoV-2”. In turn, He et al (2022) tryed to answer the question “Is the virus-laden standing water change the transmission intensity of SARS-CoV-2 after precipitation?” , while Guérin-Rechdaoui et al (2022) assessed the fate of SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus in wastewater treatment sludge during storage and thermophilic anaerobic digestion. Finally, to close the present VSI, Domingo (2022) published an updated review of the scientific literature on the origin of SARS-CoV-2.…”
Section: Comments On Papers Published In the Virtual Special Issuementioning
confidence: 99%