2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.rceng.2023.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is the use of the new Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Consortium (CKD-EPI 2021) formula appropriate for the Spanish population?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The original 2009 EPI-CKD eGFR has had a long history of acceptance by the international KDIGO community, but this may change for the 2021 refit. The 2021 CKD-EPI eGFR formula: reclassifies 9.9% of the total population and 36.2% of the G3-G5 CKD population to a lower (less severe) CKD category in Swedes [ 188 ], produces a 25% decrease in CKD prevalence in Danes [ 189 ], reclassifies 20% of stages 3-5 CKD and 10% of stages 4-5 CKD to less severe CKD in Welsh [ 190 ], and reclassifies 15% of the total population and 27% of stages 3-5 CKD population to less severe CKD categories in Spaniards [ 191 ]. The new eGFR formula overestimates mGFR: by over four fold as much as the original formula (median bias 3.6 vs. 0.8 mL/min/1.73m 2 ) in French [ 192 ], by ≥two-fold (median bias 5.7 vs. 2.4 [ 192 ], 5.5 vs. 2.4 mL/min/1.73 m 2 [ 193 ], 7.40 vs. 3.96 mL/min/1.73m 2 (7) [ 194 ]) in Europeans, by two-fold (median bias 6.4 vs. 3.3 mL/min/1.73m 2 ) in Chinese [ 195 ] and by nearly three-fold (median bias 4.8 vs. 1.8 mL/min/1.73m 2 ) in Koreans [ 196 ].…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The original 2009 EPI-CKD eGFR has had a long history of acceptance by the international KDIGO community, but this may change for the 2021 refit. The 2021 CKD-EPI eGFR formula: reclassifies 9.9% of the total population and 36.2% of the G3-G5 CKD population to a lower (less severe) CKD category in Swedes [ 188 ], produces a 25% decrease in CKD prevalence in Danes [ 189 ], reclassifies 20% of stages 3-5 CKD and 10% of stages 4-5 CKD to less severe CKD in Welsh [ 190 ], and reclassifies 15% of the total population and 27% of stages 3-5 CKD population to less severe CKD categories in Spaniards [ 191 ]. The new eGFR formula overestimates mGFR: by over four fold as much as the original formula (median bias 3.6 vs. 0.8 mL/min/1.73m 2 ) in French [ 192 ], by ≥two-fold (median bias 5.7 vs. 2.4 [ 192 ], 5.5 vs. 2.4 mL/min/1.73 m 2 [ 193 ], 7.40 vs. 3.96 mL/min/1.73m 2 (7) [ 194 ]) in Europeans, by two-fold (median bias 6.4 vs. 3.3 mL/min/1.73m 2 ) in Chinese [ 195 ] and by nearly three-fold (median bias 4.8 vs. 1.8 mL/min/1.73m 2 ) in Koreans [ 196 ].…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%