2013
DOI: 10.5367/te.2013.0196
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is the Tourism Sector Supportive of Economic Growth? Empirical Evidence on Romanian Tourism

Abstract: This paper studies the long-run relationships between tourism expansion and economic growth in Romania during the period 1988–2009. The empirical evidence highlights the nature of causal relationships, if any, between domestic travel and tourism spending, internal travel and tourism consumption, the gross domestic product annual growth rate and the real exchange rate. The paper uses the cointegration method and Granger causality analysis based on the vector error correction model (VECM) and impulse functions. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
49
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
(59 reference statements)
2
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, it should be emphasised that each country has its own particularities, which should be perceived and integrated in a wider socio-economic context (Surugiu, Surugiu, 2013). Given the above mentioned, it cannot be claimed that the FDI-led tourism hypothesis is valid for each respective country.…”
Section: Conclusion and Policy Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, it should be emphasised that each country has its own particularities, which should be perceived and integrated in a wider socio-economic context (Surugiu, Surugiu, 2013). Given the above mentioned, it cannot be claimed that the FDI-led tourism hypothesis is valid for each respective country.…”
Section: Conclusion and Policy Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, it is believed that tourism (i) increases foreign exchange earnings, which in turn can be used to finance imports (McKinnon, 1964), (ii) it encourages investment and drives local firms towards greater efficiency due to the increased competition (Krueger, 1980;Balaguer and Cantavella-Jorda, 2002), (iii) it alleviates unemployment, since tourism activities are heavily based on human capital (Brida and Pulina, 2010) and (iv) it leads to positive economies of scale thus, decreasing production costs for local businesses (Andriotis, 2002;Croes, 2006). Other recent studies which find evidence in favour of the TLEG hypothesis include Sugiyarto et al (2003), Durbarry (2004), Parrilla et al (2007), Croes and Vanegas (2008), Proenca and Soukiazis (2008), Fayissa et al (2011), Pratt (2011), Dritsakis (2012), Eeckels et al (2012), Ivanov and Webster (2013), Surugiu and Surugiu (2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The land use change can be measured using Equation (8) in hectares and Equation (9) in percent, and the equations are defined as follows:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Population growth and economic changes are two important factors influencing land use changes and the availability of agricultural land, especially in urban areas [6]. One of the drivers of economic and population growth is tourism activities [7,8]. Tourism has a strong impact on land use, both at particular sites and in adjoining zones and travel corridors [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%