2009
DOI: 10.1097/ta.0b013e3181a93630
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is the “Seat Belt Sign” Associated With Serious Abdominal Injuries in Pediatric Trauma?

Abstract: The SBS was not significantly associated with abdominal injury in our population. Patients without SBS had a higher Injury Severity Score and accounted for all of the deaths. SBS may not be as predictive of abdominal injury as previously reported.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(27 reference statements)
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…21,24,25 One prior study, however, reported a similarly low rate of pediatric laparotomy as the current study. 26 The differences in the laparotomy rates noted in prior studies are likely due to different patient populations, study protocols (prospective vs. retrospective data collection), study definitions, and surgical practices. The laparotomy rate reported in the current study is from 20 different participating institutions and thus likely represents a more generalizable estimate during an era in which nonsurgical management of most pediatric abdominal injuries is favored.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…21,24,25 One prior study, however, reported a similarly low rate of pediatric laparotomy as the current study. 26 The differences in the laparotomy rates noted in prior studies are likely due to different patient populations, study protocols (prospective vs. retrospective data collection), study definitions, and surgical practices. The laparotomy rate reported in the current study is from 20 different participating institutions and thus likely represents a more generalizable estimate during an era in which nonsurgical management of most pediatric abdominal injuries is favored.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25 In contrast, one pediatric study failed to demonstrate any association between the seat belt sign and intra-abdominal injury. 26 A large, prospective multicenter study regarding the implications of the seat belt sign in children has not previously been conducted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Even after addition of the presence of abdominal tenderness, the relative risk of an abdominal injury identified on computed tomography (CT) scan or during surgery was not significant [relative risk (RR) 1.6, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.546-4.68] [6]. In another retrospective study of children with abdominal bruising after a MVC, a multivariate logistic regression analysis determined that predictors for intestinal injuries included abdominal bruising when combined with a pulse rate of more than 120 per minute, presence of free intra-abdominal fluid on ultrasound or CT, and an associated lumbar fracture.…”
Section: Physical Exam Findings In the Evaluation Of Abdominal Traumamentioning
confidence: 98%
“…[5] However, in unusual circumstances (high velocity motor vehicle collisions) these safety measures (seat belts) can be the source and cause of serious injuries. [6789] Kulowski and Rost[10] in 1956 first described seat belt-related injuries. Garrett and Braunstein[8] described the “seat belt syndrome” as early in 1962, but Doersch and Dozier[9] discussed the term “seat belt sign” in 1968.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%