2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2017.03.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is the Routine Use of a Functional Electrical Stimulation Cycle for Lower Limb Movement Standard of Care for Acute Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(45 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…I would like to thank Drs. Stampas and York for their very interesting Point/Counterpoint debate on the use of functional electrical stimulation (FES) cycles as part of the standard of care for patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) [1]. Although some of the authors' points may apply only to their hypothetical patient, other comments appear intended to be generalizable.…”
Section: To the Editormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I would like to thank Drs. Stampas and York for their very interesting Point/Counterpoint debate on the use of functional electrical stimulation (FES) cycles as part of the standard of care for patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) [1]. Although some of the authors' points may apply only to their hypothetical patient, other comments appear intended to be generalizable.…”
Section: To the Editormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 A secondary aim was to examine relationships between muscle volume outcomes and other variables, such as parameters of exercise dose. Furthermore, because recommendations regarding appropriate patient selection are lacking, 19,20 additional clinical factors potentially affecting response were explored.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%