2019
DOI: 10.21750/refor.7.07.69
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is the recommended pH for growing hardwood seedlings wrong?

Abstract: Two schools of thought address the optimum soil pH (measured in water) for growing hardwood seedlings in bareroot nurseries. One school uses nutrient surveys in nonfertilized forests to determine the best pH range for growing seedlings in fertilized nurseries. Some students of this school believe hardwood seedlings grow best at pH 6.0 to 7.5. In contrast, another school relies on research from pH trials to conclude that fertilized hardwoods can grow well in soils that range from pH 4.5 to 6.0. This article com… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 107 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such a pH range is considered alkaline pH and is suitable for the availability of most nutrients to the roots 105 . Regarding soil chemistry, the most suitable pH range for root growth development is 6–7.5 106 . The center and north part of the study area have a more significant pH, while the south of the study area has a lower pH, which is more suitable for oak growth (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a pH range is considered alkaline pH and is suitable for the availability of most nutrients to the roots 105 . Regarding soil chemistry, the most suitable pH range for root growth development is 6–7.5 106 . The center and north part of the study area have a more significant pH, while the south of the study area has a lower pH, which is more suitable for oak growth (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1980, about 29% of managers applied AS to pines during the summer while 68% applied AN (Marx et al 1984). Some managers applied AN since it was less expensive than AS while others relied on AS due to growth benefits (van den Driessche 1972;Morris 1979) plus the ability to lower soil pH and improve seedling quality (van den Driessche 1969;South and Davey 1983;South 2017).…”
Section: Historymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on species, cultural practices, and seedling age, a crop of 1-0 pine seedlings may remove approximately 5 to 10 kg of S (Flinn et al 1980;Boyer and South 1985;South 2018). Considering four consecutive crops of pine seedlings, it is estimated that around 24 kg ha -1 of S could be harvested, resulting in a potential decrease of 12 µg g -1 in soil S levels.…”
Section: Sulphur Removed At Harvestmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations