2015
DOI: 10.1111/add.12853
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is the recent ban on animal testing of legal high products a fatal blow to the development of a legal market for ‘low‐risk’ psychoactive products in New Zealand?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The amendment revoked all interim product approvals and retail licenses and was passed in just one day (6 May 2014), without any public consultation process or Select Committee stage. The amendment also prohibited the use of animal tests for the purpose of assessing the safety of products, imposing a significant hurdle to the future viability of the regime .…”
Section: Countermobilizing For Changementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The amendment revoked all interim product approvals and retail licenses and was passed in just one day (6 May 2014), without any public consultation process or Select Committee stage. The amendment also prohibited the use of animal tests for the purpose of assessing the safety of products, imposing a significant hurdle to the future viability of the regime .…”
Section: Countermobilizing For Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The decision followed ongoing public protests against licensed retail outlets and harms associated with the interim‐approved products . The PSA remains in force but no product has been approved to date, largely due to the restrictions imposed on the use of animals to test products .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%