2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2022.04.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is the radiopacity of CAD/CAM aesthetic materials sufficient?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study, also providing great images, confirmed the joint influence of composition and thickness on radiopacity. CAD/CAM restorative materials showed thickness-dependent radiopacity development [ 61 ].…”
Section: Development Of Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study, also providing great images, confirmed the joint influence of composition and thickness on radiopacity. CAD/CAM restorative materials showed thickness-dependent radiopacity development [ 61 ].…”
Section: Development Of Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three disc-shaped (5 mm diameter, 2 mm thick) samples were prepared using a mold for each tested material (n = 3). 24,32 Composite resins were placed in a single increment and polymerized with a LED (light-emitting diode) curing unit (1200 mW/ cm 2 , Blue Lex GT-1200, Monitex, China) according to manufacturers' instructions. A Mylar strip was placed before a glass slide was applied to flatten the surface before light irradiation.…”
Section: Sample Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evaluation of the radiopacities of restorative materials consists of enamel, dentin, and aluminum (Al) comparisons 20–23 . According to the ISO 13116 specifications, the radiopacity of restorative materials should be equal to or higher than that of the same aluminum thickness, 12 which is similar to that of human dentin 24 . It is reported that to detect secondary caries, a higher radiopacity than human enamel is required for restorative materials 25 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation