1977
DOI: 10.1016/0040-5809(77)90023-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is the most frequent allele the oldest?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
146
0
1

Year Published

1986
1986
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 245 publications
(151 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
4
146
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Since population genetic theory suggests that the most frequent allele is the oldest (Watterson and Guess, 1977) and therefore likely to be the ancestral allele, we compared our data at the variable positions with the corresponding data from the chimpanzee reference sequence (http://www.genome.ucsc.edu/; March 2006 assembly). While the major allele at the majority (412 of 544; 76%) of variable sites in our data coincided with the ancestral (chimpanzee reference sequence) allele, at the remaining 132 (24%) sites the major allele is not the ancestral allele.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since population genetic theory suggests that the most frequent allele is the oldest (Watterson and Guess, 1977) and therefore likely to be the ancestral allele, we compared our data at the variable positions with the corresponding data from the chimpanzee reference sequence (http://www.genome.ucsc.edu/; March 2006 assembly). While the major allele at the majority (412 of 544; 76%) of variable sites in our data coincided with the ancestral (chimpanzee reference sequence) allele, at the remaining 132 (24%) sites the major allele is not the ancestral allele.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the assumption cannot be so easily swallowed that each lineage always traces in a much shorter time to a single ancestral haplotype within a restricted population of a single species that lacks an alternative population to provide ''infinitely many nonancestral chromosomes.'' The assumption that each lineage always traces in estimable time to a single ancestral haplotype (''most recent common ancestor'') that can be reliably inferred has other f laws: the rarest allele for each polymorphism in a haploset has a finite probability of being the oldest one, and so the probability that m polymorphisms all trace to a single ancestral haplotype tends to zero as m increases, and the most recent common ancestor and its associated time vary greatly along a chromosome (27).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since SNPs of lower minor-allele frequencies are in general those of younger age (Watterson and Guess 1977), applying minor-allele frequency cutoff is likened to eliminating recent SNPs of younger age. Though this may also risk losing some ancient SNPs with one of their alleles fixed in the population, Halushka et al (1999) found that only 5% of the rare SNPs that they investigated represent ancient allele that is being lost through evolution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%