2017
DOI: 10.20997/sr.18.4.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is the Mid-point of a Likert-type Scale Necessary?: Comparison between the Scales with or without the Mid-point

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, the framework ( Figure 1 ) included situational predictors based on the changed lifestyle patterns and health concepts of young adults, as discussed in Heo and Jang’s work. 11
Figure 1 Conceptual framework for the study.
…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Additionally, the framework ( Figure 1 ) included situational predictors based on the changed lifestyle patterns and health concepts of young adults, as discussed in Heo and Jang’s work. 11
Figure 1 Conceptual framework for the study.
…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The absence of a midpoint in Likert scale responses forces a positive or negative response to questions. 11 This scale seeks to understand respondents’ general attitudes, not the knowledge or existence of unpredictable conditions; therefore, a 5-point Likert scale with a midpoint was used to prevent the distortion of responses (1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations